Comments on: Misleading ST article on “rise” in productivity when it continues to decrease in 2009

By: Chua Mui Chee aka ah Looong Hoong

Chua Mui Chee aka ah Looong Hoong — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:59:21 +0000

Statistics from ST sure can be trusted wan. We no need think of checking how they get this stats wan. ST is unbiased and totally honest. They wont lie to the people wan. See, all these years the things they write are so well loved and trusted by the people they keep buying the news even when it hiked.

haha, singaporeans so good.

By: Legend82

Legend82 — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:52:26 +0000

incidently… did anyone notice the MOST READ postings??
All 10 pieces are regarding Jerk Neo and his bitches….

Damn sad…

By: Annie Lim

Annie Lim — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:11:54 +0000

PAP and Lee family asslickers at work, all day, all night, without fail! VOTE THEM ALL OUT!

By: SK

SK — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:30:05 +0000

I have stopped subscribing to ST for 2 years. I don’t find anything intelligent coming from the newspaper and the journalists’ writing are very much like a reporting style with no critical elements in it.

ST jopurnalists also need to “upgrade” their interviewing skills. You may notice many times the questions are very predictable when they interview “successful personel” quote
Are you a saver or a spender?
How much you invest?
What type of car you drive?

By: Jeremy Boh Yong

Jeremy Boh Yong — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:14:25 +0000

shameful reporting from north korean-inspired media. i have swore not to buy any sph products ever, all rubbish.

By: The Shame Times

The Shame Times — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:59:59 +0000

all new low for this shameless paper and the equally shameless Jeremy loser. too bad not enough ppl will see the truth. if only everyone read TR.

By: Chin Lam

Chin Lam — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:26:50 +0000

To build a better mouse trap ?

As a professional grass cutter. We are always expected to over deliver but the tender prices or best sourcing prices kept getting lower. There is a limit to “productivity” unless we use more FT ?.

By: Shit

Shit — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:33:34 +0000

I have stopped buying shit Times one year ago. I don’t believe in what they write.

By: Jerome Chua Mui Mui of the Looong

Jerome Chua Mui Mui of the Looong — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:17:09 +0000

does anyone know who can audit their data given to the public.
i mean , this is a technical question. the question is ‘who’?

By: Now not talent anymore

Now not talent anymore — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:52:46 +0000

Dear ADMIN

Please have a “States-Time exposed” as well as “ZaoBao exposed”

It makes me boiled this morning when i browse at LianHeZaoBao when they use SUPER-GIANT fonts to highlight “REDUCTION in Work Permit” this year, when the reduction (after 5 straight years of increase) is merely 0.4%.

If this is not Pian-Ah-Gong or Xian-Ah-Ma, i dont know what it is.

@ Jim on Tue, 16th Mar 2010 5:10 pm

To Admin, Can you create one column called The Straits Times EXPOSED! or something similar so that such misleading and biased articles can be archived for all to refer to in future?