Chorus of Change for Singaporean: Survival Guide to Sustainable Nationhood
By Voice of Citizens
We, the Citizens, are not against Immigration Policy per se. We are deeply against the ill-conceived manner in which huge and rapid influx of FT/PR are admitted into our country recently.
We are frustrated with the HDB policy and poor planning which does take into account housing needs of increasing population. It is inexcusable to say that HDB could not have anticipated such shortage.
The effects of rapid accelerating growth in FT/PR and housing shortage have are severe impact on many citizens in terms of their housing needs and employment.
What is the solution? What do we need to do re-define, refine and build a sustainable growth and Nationhood?
Broadly for layman terms, the next steps forward will be:
1. “FT/PR” population growth impact /HDB housing shortage must be immediately resolved to dampen the intertwining vicious effects of escalating cost of housing and employment marginalization of citizens.
2. “FT/PR” policies must drastically reduce the quantum and growth of population attributable to foreign intake and allow moderate sustainable growth which;
1. will be consistent with the level of living standards of citizens
2. will not stifle livelihood and hopes of citizens, inducing stress and strain, fear of future cost
3. will allow a sustainable employment growth and alleviate many other concerns associated with it.
3. The “FT/PR” & Housing Policies must not put adverse pressure on services, amenities, housing and employment to the extent as felt now.
4. “FT/PR” & Housing Policy must consecrate within it the “Ten Commandments” of Citizen Privilege & Right. Simply said, the Policy must:
1. be discriminative to FT/PR to ensure maximum benefits of citizens
2. not be prohibitive to citizens, creating long-term housing debt, especially lesser privilege class, middle-class and singles.
3. be less disruptive to citizen livelihood and sense of hope and purpose
4. not be de-motivating to citizen drive to betterment in livelihood
5. not be depriving of citizen rights and privileges for affordable housing
6. not be constraining on citizen lives
7. not create inflationary-inducing, cost escalation inducing, speculative-inducing effect that are disruptive
8. not bias towards selective classes
9. not be politically motivated.
10. above-all be citizen-centric, Singaporean First
5. Resultant effect of reducing the intertwining impact of FT influx and housing cost must bring cost down to level for future sustainable trend, commensurate measured growth amenable to the citizen.
6. Polices must be in-place to limit PR purchase of Re-sales and cost escalation, increase the supply of HDB much more and quicker to bring housing cost at level not disadvantaging the middle, sandwiched, lower class.
7. HDB policy should de-peg new HDB price to Resales Value and provide cheaper land cost.
8. Immigration Policy must be in-place to limit FT/PR and have stricter criteria of selection for FT/PR.
9. Government must stop artificial inflation via monopoly of land and housing and refrain from exhortation of future price raises, giving way to speculation and false “wealth creation” for political motive or otherwise pandering to mass lemming instinct and greed.
10. Resale HDB must be for Singaporeans only and there must be distinctive and restrictive criteria for PR ownership of HDB housing which will not give way to runaway COV and escalating housing cost.
11. Cramping down on Resale asset valuation will bring about amenable and beneficial asset appreciation to all citizens in long-run:
1. For all-those who have seen “value” raise recently, they will be affected in the short to medium terms but they will still benefit in longer terms
2. For those are adversely affected by recent escalation, they have chance to buy without incurring huge debt
3. For those who upgraded to stay long-term they will still see appreciation in future.
4. On the average, more will benefit on the broader front and longer terms
12. Another beneficial effect is lower cost of business operation as rental cost goes down across-the-board, thus providing lower cost base for business operation as employers pay lesser to foreign staff for housing accommodation.
13. There will be “temporary” loss or reduction of National Reserve due to expenditure/sacrifice of reserve to bring cost down and capital reduction of asset value, but on the whole, with lower housing and other cost mitigation measures, the overall cost of business will go down as well as expectations of citizens.
14. Citizens will be prepared to take lower salaries since their basic housing and other needs are satisfied, amongst other concomitant savings as the result of cost reduction in other services, food and others.
15. The indirect result of having being able to satisfy much lower cost housing and employment needs in higher motivation to self-actualize for higher goals.
16. Re-engineering of productivity-based economy must come about with higher investment in citizen skills and upgrading, more and better sustainable industries. Once this is realized, more skill-based national productivity can be realized with manageable general trend of salary increase with higher living standard and manageable costs in longer term.
17. The initial period may see our National Reserve decline but it is worth-while effort as we pursue the course of re-engineering our economy to allow sustainable growth of selective industries, re-building a Nation utilizing our reserve productively such that every citizen has sense of hope and purpose in the Nation, not as a “sacrificial sheep” following the Lion, but a “beaver” in each individual, the clever, smart and hardworking maker of “dams”.
18. Together, we, “beavers”, will re-build the “dam of reserve” for future generation as our forefather did for the present generation.
19. The heavy-weight government machineries must be leaner and leaders show sacrifice, not speaking virtues with obscene pay. Only then can they hold hand in hand with the citizens to re-build a Nation.
20. There is no such thing as inevitability of rich-poor divide. “Divide” there is but surely there is way to close the” divide” by refining our policies.
21. With our excellent infrastructure, lower cost base for citizens with privilege and rights preserved, we can once again grow gradually to new heights with collective spirit of one Heart & Soul of Nation.
22. We need, now, to re-charge ourselves create impetus and drive from lower cost base start where cost of owning home and living is not prohibitive in citizen terms, not too prohibitive that it stranglehold their lives and dampen hopes and aspirations.
23. From here we aim forward to build better and affordable home for next generation, knowing each economic cycle of limits of growth and cost clearly over a projected frame, plan, anticipate and adjust accordingly without the disruptive burst of ill-conceived policies ramming down our throats, recently, in desperation.
24. We must the citizens from the “Animal farm” claustrophobia and start teaming in an “open farm” belong to citizens where we once again “till the land” for the current and next generation.
25. In short, we need a period of economic re-engineering, convalescence at slower growth as we re-define and refine our Nation, starting from a lower cost base favorable to the Citizens.
PAP must have the moral courage to say “SORRY” to citizens for not anticipating the adverse impact due to the intertwining effects huge foreign influx and ill-conceived HDB planning.
The present policies of accelerating population growth will not work, without knowing clearly the impact of such rapid growth on the cost of living, housing and employment, the limits of strain and stress our Nation can take in terms of infrastructure, relation, space, individual livelihood and etc.
The consequence to the Nation in future will be disastrous. Even now many citizens are feeling the limits of stress and strain.
Will our great Ministers sign off their wealth on paper to the Citizens, as guarantee of their superb leadership in return for Citizens to entrust their stake in Nationhood in their hands?
If NOT DO NOT CREATE false hopes that housing of Resales will sustain continuously uptrend, thus raising value of asset artificially across the board. Validity, inherent risks, potential pitfalls and limits of their rationale must be communicated earnestly, impartially and clearly to the citizens or lives of many innocents will be jeopardized. DO NOT DICE with citizen debt as they are NOT GOD.
Good Government governs with citizen interest, NOT lead them into eternal debt. Current “wealth” of Rich & Powerful is always at the expense of others and next generation.
They know it. So why create such a humungous cost to next generation with present housing policy and rapid foreign influx, knowing the adverse ramifications, if left unchecked?
It is imperative a solution must be put in place as quickly as possible.
This is the challenge to the Multi-million dollar Ministers.
Voice of Citizen
13 Responses to “Chorus of Change for Singaporean: Survival Guide to Sustainable Nationhood”
Alex Tan Allan Ooi AWARE Chee Soon Juan Chiam See Tong Claire Lee David Widjaja DBS Dr Allan Ooi Dr Silviu Ionescu Dr Vivian Balakrishnan Foyce Le Xuan highnote5 Hong Lim Park Jack Lin Xinli Jack Neo Jack Neo affair Jack Neo scandal Josie Lau Josie Lau Meng Lee Lee Kuan Yew Lehman brothers Lighthouse Evangelism MAS minibonds Miss Singapore World NTU stabbing PAP Pastor Rony Tan Ris Low Romanian diplomat in hit-and-run Rony Tan S-League silviu ionescu Singapore Singapore 2010 Youth Olympic Games Tan Kin Lian Thio Su Mien Tiger Woods affair Tong Kok Wai Top 8 Vivian Balakrishnan Wendy Chong Y O G Youth Olympic Games
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.








compared to the past, where population was only 2.5million , sg is indeed a small country and 1 party dominance is easier accepted if not tolerated.
now, sg has grown despite the same land size.
the sg of today is not the sg of yesterday. it is around 4.5 million, if recall correctly.
There is now a good reason for more opposition voice in sg. There is good reason now for an ALTERNATIVE Team due to the population explosion. The size of the land cannot deny the need for a strong Alternative for the future of the nation needs more Talents to safe guard the interests of the people especially those supporting an alternative team.
So, we must not be misled to think that due to the land size of the dot there is no room for alternative team. The population has exploded and continues to explode. Sg is now bigger than before.
Dear Voice of Citizens,
Your article summarizes well the feelings of the people, the flaws of current policies, and the steps that need to be taken to right the wrongs. Thank you for your effort.
For a country that assumes (or rather projected by the incumbent govt (PAP) that Singapore is a first-world country, I do wonder if there are any talents in Singapore? How come the so-called talents are being brought in willy-nilly from third-world countries. The definition is nonsensical and farcical lar.
It is befuddling or are we being naive to believe the concocted lies,excuses put up for the the FT policy by the incumbent ruling party and govt ?
It is probable that it has political motives to it rather than economics. And even if there were economic reasons it probably is too ’small’.
Never heard of any politician from another country giving priority to foreginers and relegating its own citizens for political gains.
The solution is not to change policy or tighten unchecked immigration lar. I say that cos they are no longer interested in Singaporeans’ welfare or the nation but only to serve themselves.
We are dealing with a govt that has lost touch with reality and has arrogated absolute power. However, they seem to be irresponsible when it calls for greater responsibility.
The solution and a wise one would be to VOTE THEM OUT AND and re-instate the dignity of a nation.
PS – Singapore citizenship is now given away like flyers lar
Frankly , do you think papaya will still lisent to us ?? fat hope.
In the 40 years , they did what they like and till today , no change . A good example is the serangoon quaters and the rental flats in mature estates . don’t be fooled by their promises as they only wayang during election .
TR and Readers,
I seriously really wonder how is sg gonna get Change when it is well known that its people generally holds the Bo Chap attitude if not KiaSi psychology?
I really cannot imagine there will be change despite all that has happened and all the good reasons for it.
Many employers nowadays find that local employees are less hardworking than the FW. There may be some truth in it according to my observation. THIS IS BECAUSE local employee are very much demoralised by the FW/PR policy which has depressed their earnings, employers have threatened their employees by hinting that they can be replaced by cheaper FW anytime. Especially the PMETs who have worked in a company half of his lifetime to find the company treated them unfairly. SAD…
We need to teach these papaya a lesson…
Vote out a GRC or two, along with some inept ministers. That should wake them up. That too, should give opposition an impetus for future GEs.
17. The initial period may see our National Reserve decline but it is worth-while effort as we pursue the course of re-engineering our economy…
Agree. Actually this is not a bad thing. Let Singapore “crumble” for a few years – we won’t die. Slow down perhaps.
FOLKS OUT THERE,
PLS GO TO THE 15YR OLD BOY KENNETH LIN PETITION ARTICLE AND VOLUNTARILY SIGN UP IF YOU REALLY WANT TO SEE CHANGE.
CURRENTLY WE STILL NEED 223 SIGNATURES TO ALLOW KENNETH LIN TO KICK START AND PUSH THIS AGENDA FOR SINGAPOREANS. MANY OF ALD DONE SO LIAO. DON’T WAIT ANYMORE.
GIVE KENNETH LIN AND OTHERS TO HELP US SINGAPOERANS A CHANCE TO FIGHT FOR YOU AND ME CITIZENSHIP RIGHTS.
GO NOW AND SIGN UP YA! THANKS IN ADVANCE.. VOTE FOR CHANGE.
Well we have 8 ministers in the PMO to do the job of a one PM & one DPM. (8 ministers : 1 MM, 1 SM, 1 PM, 2 DPMs, and 3 other ministers (LSS, LHK, LHH) in the PMO)
Look at the state of affairs they’ve lead Sg into.
To recover from it, dont’ be surprised that they’ll need to appoint ANOTHER 8 more ministers into the PMO to solve the problems caused by the first 8.
folks,
vote for change!! go to sign up the petition call at kenneth lin’s article. currently reach 24o signatures liao.
very gd response. every min and every sec ppl are signing including those who are not native ones..
pls go and voluntarily sign ya and support it if we really want to see GREAT CHANGE IN SINGAPORE!!!
SINGAPORE FOR SINGAPOREANS!!! VOTE OUT ALL PAPPIES NOW!!!
kilimanjaro on Sun, 21st Feb 2010 11:16 pm ,
you are not alone with this thinking.
last 2 elections, where many many citizens were disenfranchised (denied the chance to vote due to walkover), similarly many many issues of concern the people had and this Sentiment was reflected in the Awesome! Turn out for all opposition Rallies.
What is more important is what these TRANSLATED into. When the votes were COUNTED!!!! it spoke another story.
Admittedly, this time round the Issues are Superset of all the last 2 elections and then some. Yet, despite this, the unexplainable phenomenon of the mismatch haunts me till today and as long as this issue is not Addressed and Resolved, I firmly believe
History shall repeat itself.
Opposition need to Do Superhuman work in order to Make History.
Either that or we have to endure the pain in the @@## and wait for the ultimate forkinator to be fork by the forker.
history has proven singaporeans just simply would not vote for change despite whatever the issues.
this to me is unique situation in the world.
due to this, i do not want to be disappointed again and thus have no anticipation for change in the next election.
nevertheless, i do see a ray of light at the end of the next 5 years After the next election.
This next 5 years can be used productively by opposition to recruit as many candidates as possible. These should not be aggressively attacking but aggressively proposing Alternative solutions for the People and compare with current model.
The huge losses , PMETs suffering, the inSecurity felt by people aging into their 40’s, the cost of living, cost of doing business and continued reliance on foreign resources and the severe reliance on export all suggests a market for Alternative solutions. Its a Wide and Big market.
After the final retirement is period i long to see. To see how the remaining talents can stand on their own and be challenged one by one by Alternative Talents who present their own solutions for the nation.
1 by 1 , i would enjoy seeing them being challenged. that would be climax time for me.