Najib rejects royal commission to probe Dr M
Bernama, 30 December 2009
Prime Minister Najib Razak said there was no need for a royal commission of inquiry to look into allegations hurled at former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad in the book ‘Malaysian Maverick: Mahathir Mohamad in Turbulent Times’ authored by Barry Wain.
“There is always this call for a royal commission, everything you want royal commission, but (this) is not appropriate to call for a royal commission just because somebody has written a book.
“What is important for us is to look forward to the future. Each prime minister has made a lot of contribution, otherwise we wouldn’t be what we are today, Malaysia will not be a successful nation and regarded as a role model if all the PMs in the past had not made their contribution,” he said.
On Dec 21, DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang in his blog had urged Najib to set up a royal commission to probe the allegations contained in the book, which among others had claimed that Mahathir had squandered up to RM100 billion during his 22 years as prime minister.
In an immediate response, Mahathir in his ‘Chedet’ blog welcomed the call for a royal inquiry and said he would cooperate fully with the commission.
Wain, who is the former managing editor of Asian Wall Street Journal, has estimated that Mahathir had squandered up to RM100 billion in his years as PM.
Gentle introduction of GST
Najib also that there was still time to see the full implications of the Goods and Services (GST) tax in 2011 but nevertheless, believed it would have a neutral impact overall.
“Obviously we have to look at the details of the impact of the GST, but the policy is that basically it will be a gentle introduction and it should have a neutral effect in terms of prices.
“We still have time because it’s not going to be implemented until 2011 if we decide to go ahead with it…
“I’m not saying it is for sure but what we have decided to do is to introduce the bill (on it), it is not the second reading yet so we still have the time to look at the full implications of the GST,” he said when asked what is impact would be on gap in prices of goods sold in the peninsula and East Malaysia. ]
BN to mull direct membership
He also said that BN needs to study the suggestion of direct membership into the ruling coalition before making a decision on the matter.
Commenting on the call made by Information Communication and Culture Minister Dr Rais Yatim, Najib, who is also BN chairman, Najib said he would raise the matter with the leaders of BN component parties.
“This is not something new, we (component parties) have talked about it but have not made an official decision.
“Let me discuss this with the BN component parties at the (BN) supreme council first… we will have to study the pros and cons and the methodology to be employed if we were to go ahead with the direct membership idea.
“All these must be tackled first because we do not want problems to arise later,” he told reporters after opening Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah’s (PBRS) 14th annual congress in Kota Kinabalu today. – Bernama
2 Responses to “Najib rejects royal commission to probe Dr M”
Alex Tan Allan Ooi AWARE Chee Soon Juan Chiam See Tong Claire Lee David Widjaja DBS Dr Allan Ooi Dr Silviu Ionescu Foyce Le Xuan George Yeo GIC highnote5 highnotes5 Hong Lim Park Jack Lin Xinli Jack Neo Jack Neo affair Jack Neo press conference Jack Neo scandal Josie Lau Josie Lau Meng Lee Lee Kuan Yew Lehman brothers Lighthouse Evangelism Malaysia MAS minibonds Miss Singapore World NTU stabbing Pastor Rony Tan Ris Low Romanian diplomat in hit-and-run Rony Tan S-League Sex silviu ionescu Singapore Tan Kin Lian Thio Su Mien Tiger Woods affair Tong Kok Wai Top 8 Wendy Chong
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.









Its parts of the deal when he was appointed as PM and given support by Mahathir himself
Then how can he set up the royal commission?
They come from the same stock
Perhaps it is timely that we also ask our no-nonsense, clean and corrupt-free Government to look into the following to establish correctness and truth:
a. If ISD in carrying out their duties did commit violence against Dr.Poh Soo Kai, Dr.Lim Hock Siew, Teo Soh Lung, Francis Seow, etc. in the light of their revelations in conversations, talk, writings and biographies.
b. Perhaps we find out also if the ISD had been proper in the execution of their duties after all most of the directors and staff of the ISD had retired and many senior ISD members have been rewarded comfortable executive positions in GLCs.
c. In the light of the revelations in the books written by the ex-political detainees e.g. Dr. Poh Soo Kai, Dr. Loh Hock Siew, Zaid Zahari if there were any truths in their works that history may be accordingly recorded for posterity.
d. In the light of the unlocking of secret archives from the colonial era by the British Government if the official Singapore history had been correct recorded.
e. In the light of the writing of Francis Seow, Tang Hong Liang and others (eminent lawyers and QCs) if the judiciary had been correct in politically-related trails.
There are many other subjects that TR readers can think of. We need only to establish Truth Commissions. We do not even need to prosecute anyone and in this spirit, let us forgive and forget, make right what is wrong and seek forgiveness for mistakes if any.
Many (if not all) Singaporeans want it the truth. After all we are brothers, sisters and family.