<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wong Kan Seng reveals that two-thirds of PR applications are successful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/</link>
	<description>The Voice of Singapore from Singaporeans for Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:05:09 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NB</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-3/#comment-44949</link>
		<dc:creator>NB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44949</guid>
		<description>Singapore has fast becoming the public place of the world, people can come here at will, shit and then go away without any obligation or responsibility !!!! When I heard PRC saying that it is easier to come here than going to their own city like Hong Kong, it make me wonder what Singapore has become under the current government !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singapore has fast becoming the public place of the world, people can come here at will, shit and then go away without any obligation or responsibility !!!! When I heard PRC saying that it is easier to come here than going to their own city like Hong Kong, it make me wonder what Singapore has become under the current government !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fpc</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-3/#comment-44816</link>
		<dc:creator>fpc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44816</guid>
		<description>The official replacement rate is more than 2.

Yet the govt has asked us to stop at 2 not long ago.

How accurate are their projections?


//citizen:

well said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The official replacement rate is more than 2.</p>
<p>Yet the govt has asked us to stop at 2 not long ago.</p>
<p>How accurate are their projections?</p>
<p>//citizen:</p>
<p>well said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-2/#comment-44269</link>
		<dc:creator>citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44269</guid>
		<description>If u can&#039;t manage 1 dangerous man who escaped from a so called secured facility, how do u expect to manage a horde of new PRs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If u can&#8217;t manage 1 dangerous man who escaped from a so called secured facility, how do u expect to manage a horde of new PRs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fpc</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-2/#comment-44252</link>
		<dc:creator>fpc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44252</guid>
		<description>//bubble trouble 

As if there were only 100K approved over the last 3 years yearly.

Did you read what he said?

Instead of asking why we cannot give birth to beat this inflow of PR, why not you ask how come Singapore cannot keep its own people in Singapore?

The source of people where these pr come from is not where the Singaporeans (emigrated) go to.

Hong Kong has a freer economy and we don&#039;t see many HKers want to leave HK now. In fact, their replacement rate is higher than us and we have approximately the same level of development.

Please do not confuse the cause with the effect.

The cause of the low replacement rate is poor governance.

Singaporean People just don&#039;t believe in the future with this government. They either get out or if they cannot get out, they spend whatever they could ; otherwise the govt will suck these monies from them anyway.

Why leave offsprings here in Singapore to be tortured?

Case in point: when Singapore was just coming into being, after leaving Malaysia, all the way until the late 80s, we still have high replacement rate. So high to the point that LKY needed to stop it.

People believed in the country then.

Now, they have no faith in the country. 

Go ask any grandfather and grandmother and see if they like what see now. One of them even complaint about FT on TV in front of the clowns in parliament.

Why subject your children (if you intend to have) to silly policies by LKY that he regretted only after 40 years (maybe 30 or 20, with LKY, or clowns in general, how sure are we of their statistics)?

Do you really think it takes that long to realise that it was a mistake?

What a joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>//bubble trouble </p>
<p>As if there were only 100K approved over the last 3 years yearly.</p>
<p>Did you read what he said?</p>
<p>Instead of asking why we cannot give birth to beat this inflow of PR, why not you ask how come Singapore cannot keep its own people in Singapore?</p>
<p>The source of people where these pr come from is not where the Singaporeans (emigrated) go to.</p>
<p>Hong Kong has a freer economy and we don&#8217;t see many HKers want to leave HK now. In fact, their replacement rate is higher than us and we have approximately the same level of development.</p>
<p>Please do not confuse the cause with the effect.</p>
<p>The cause of the low replacement rate is poor governance.</p>
<p>Singaporean People just don&#8217;t believe in the future with this government. They either get out or if they cannot get out, they spend whatever they could ; otherwise the govt will suck these monies from them anyway.</p>
<p>Why leave offsprings here in Singapore to be tortured?</p>
<p>Case in point: when Singapore was just coming into being, after leaving Malaysia, all the way until the late 80s, we still have high replacement rate. So high to the point that LKY needed to stop it.</p>
<p>People believed in the country then.</p>
<p>Now, they have no faith in the country. </p>
<p>Go ask any grandfather and grandmother and see if they like what see now. One of them even complaint about FT on TV in front of the clowns in parliament.</p>
<p>Why subject your children (if you intend to have) to silly policies by LKY that he regretted only after 40 years (maybe 30 or 20, with LKY, or clowns in general, how sure are we of their statistics)?</p>
<p>Do you really think it takes that long to realise that it was a mistake?</p>
<p>What a joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KNN</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-2/#comment-44241</link>
		<dc:creator>KNN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44241</guid>
		<description>Our immigration policy is a failure as it can only attract the so called foreign talents that are not better than the locals but are giving overcrowding problem, depressed wages and skyrocketed property. Lee Hsien Loong is a totally failure PM while WKS is a hopeless minister who cannot do his job properly and can only talk cock!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our immigration policy is a failure as it can only attract the so called foreign talents that are not better than the locals but are giving overcrowding problem, depressed wages and skyrocketed property. Lee Hsien Loong is a totally failure PM while WKS is a hopeless minister who cannot do his job properly and can only talk cock!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is WKS ACTUALLY doing???....</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-2/#comment-44226</link>
		<dc:creator>What is WKS ACTUALLY doing???....</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44226</guid>
		<description>LOL... IN come 2/3s to become PRs for &quot;terrorising&quot; many of us of our jobs and also to replace and fill the shoes of one BIG dangerous terrorist who went OUT!!! Oh so NEAT!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230; IN come 2/3s to become PRs for &#8220;terrorising&#8221; many of us of our jobs and also to replace and fill the shoes of one BIG dangerous terrorist who went OUT!!! Oh so NEAT!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sin-galore</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-2/#comment-44143</link>
		<dc:creator>sin-galore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44143</guid>
		<description>To David (Tue, 24th Nov 2009 5:27 pm): &quot;This is what Lee Kwan Yew classified as skilled and carefully vetted talent.&quot;

I am so totally not surprised. PRs are useful only if they can push up GDP. That might explain why one of the posters could not get a PR for his wife.

In fact, under LKY, all sorts of PRs are welcome so long as they can work and make a living. Including EX-CONVICTS, and we&#039;re talking about EX-CONVICTS who have committed serious crimes such that they are not allowed to go on home detention.

Singapore does not repatriate any EX-CONVICT PRs so long as they can find a job here, ie &quot;contribute&quot; to the economy. In fact, PRs currently serving their jail sentence can apply to leave jail early on the pretext of &quot;work&quot; === Early Work Release Programme.

So you see, PRs are indeed &quot;vetted carefully&quot; - the only criterion is whether they can be gainfully employed.

Trash the foreign trash policy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To David (Tue, 24th Nov 2009 5:27 pm): &#8220;This is what Lee Kwan Yew classified as skilled and carefully vetted talent.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am so totally not surprised. PRs are useful only if they can push up GDP. That might explain why one of the posters could not get a PR for his wife.</p>
<p>In fact, under LKY, all sorts of PRs are welcome so long as they can work and make a living. Including EX-CONVICTS, and we&#8217;re talking about EX-CONVICTS who have committed serious crimes such that they are not allowed to go on home detention.</p>
<p>Singapore does not repatriate any EX-CONVICT PRs so long as they can find a job here, ie &#8220;contribute&#8221; to the economy. In fact, PRs currently serving their jail sentence can apply to leave jail early on the pretext of &#8220;work&#8221; === Early Work Release Programme.</p>
<p>So you see, PRs are indeed &#8220;vetted carefully&#8221; &#8211; the only criterion is whether they can be gainfully employed.</p>
<p>Trash the foreign trash policy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time for Change</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-2/#comment-44119</link>
		<dc:creator>Time for Change</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44119</guid>
		<description>Checks &amp; false balances on Wed, 25th Nov 2009 3:27 pm 

That is right. They are just playing with the numbers to make it more acceptable to Singaporeans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checks &amp; false balances on Wed, 25th Nov 2009 3:27 pm </p>
<p>That is right. They are just playing with the numbers to make it more acceptable to Singaporeans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Checks &#38; false balances</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-2/#comment-44094</link>
		<dc:creator>Checks &#38; false balances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44094</guid>
		<description>bubble trouble on Wed, 25th Nov 2009 2:18 pm 

..only 46k got it in one year mah. AVERAGED over 10 years...&quot;

Manipulation in deception! If they take the total PR and divide by 44 years, the average would be even a LOT LOWER. Most of them came in the last few years said by LHL to be over 100,000 per year.. At this rate, the truth is HIDDEN BY A MILE THICKNESS OF LIES that only 46,000 came in per year. 


In three years, it would add more than 300,000 instead of 46,000 X 3 or 138,000. The TRUTH would be a margin of distortion of lies of 217%

HOW COULD WE TRUST THEIR UTTERANCE???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bubble trouble on Wed, 25th Nov 2009 2:18 pm </p>
<p>..only 46k got it in one year mah. AVERAGED over 10 years&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Manipulation in deception! If they take the total PR and divide by 44 years, the average would be even a LOT LOWER. Most of them came in the last few years said by LHL to be over 100,000 per year.. At this rate, the truth is HIDDEN BY A MILE THICKNESS OF LIES that only 46,000 came in per year. </p>
<p>In three years, it would add more than 300,000 instead of 46,000 X 3 or 138,000. The TRUTH would be a margin of distortion of lies of 217%</p>
<p>HOW COULD WE TRUST THEIR UTTERANCE???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubble trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/24/wong-kan-seng-sustained-inflow-of-immigrants-will-benefit-singaporeans/comment-page-2/#comment-44077</link>
		<dc:creator>bubble trouble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasekreview.com/?p=18215#comment-44077</guid>
		<description>&gt; However, there were 70K applications in a backdrop of 3 million Singaporeans.
&gt; That is a lot of new additions.

not a lot lah.  only 46k got it in one year mah.  AVERAGED over 10 years.  but they mostly came within the last 3 years lah.  that&#039;s like maybe average of 100k a year for the last 3 years.  not a lot lah.

after all, we give birth already can get 50k a year liao.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; However, there were 70K applications in a backdrop of 3 million Singaporeans.<br />
&gt; That is a lot of new additions.</p>
<p>not a lot lah.  only 46k got it in one year mah.  AVERAGED over 10 years.  but they mostly came within the last 3 years lah.  that&#8217;s like maybe average of 100k a year for the last 3 years.  not a lot lah.</p>
<p>after all, we give birth already can get 50k a year liao.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
