Singapore’s missing pillars of democracy (Part 3): Building the most important pillar right now
OPINION
As we have seen from Part 2 of the article, Singapore has only one (or rather, half) pillar out of the seven pillars of democracy.
Though Singapore conducts elections every five years, it lacks freedom of expression, political tolerance, rule of law and a civil society. Even the elections are far from free and fair.
How are we going to build these pillars right from scratch in the face of all the obstacles the ruling party has placed in our paths in order to preserve and perpetuate its political hegemony?
The opposition is weak, divided and powerless. There is literally no civil society to speak of. When there is one like Marauh, it prefers to fight for human rights in ASEAN rather than for Singaporeans. The Law Society is muzzled – it cannot utter a single word without permission from the ruling party. The police is empowered and authorized to harass and intimidate political activists into silence. The press is controlled by the ruling party. Most importantly, most Singaporeans remain ignorant, naive and apathetic about politics.
Why is the ruling party able to exert so much control, influence and dominance over every aspect of life in Singapore? It is able to do so because of a submissive, ignorant and disunited citizenry. Had it tried its dirty tricks in Hong Kong, Taiwan or South Korea (all “Confucian” societies like Singapore), widespread protests will occur and it will probably be voted out at the next earliest opportunity.
A politically aware, astute and active citizenry is the best form of defense against the excesses and abuses of power by all forms of dictatorships. As long the people are aware of their inherent rights as citizens, astute enough to differentiate the myths spun by the state media from the truths and actively participate in the socio-political life of their country, the regime will not dare to continue riding roughshod over us.
Singapore is not North Korea. We are an open, advanced and developed first world country. The regime cannot continue to afford damaging its own credibility by using the police and the law to criminalize legitimate political activity and dissent. Therefore it can only do so quietly away from public view and scrutiny.
Take for example the latest police rejection of SDP’s application for a permit to speak at Fajar wet market without giving any valid reasons. Had this happened in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong or Taiwan, a public backlash will be triggered and the police chief may even be called to step down.
Only in Singapore can the police stifle peaceful forms of political activity as such with impunity because first the media does not report on it and second, Singaporeans are too de-politicized to realize its significance.
The most pillar of democracy we must build right now is freedom of information (expression). Once we break the stranglehold of information by the propagandist mouthpiece of the regime, they can no longer continue to hide the unsavory aspects of their hegemony from the people.
It takes time to re-educate fellow Singaporeans who have been brainwashed by years of state propaganda, but time is on our side.
The older generation of Singaporeans depend chiefly on the state media for their news. They can be easily deceived and misled by SPH spin doctors to believe that the ruling party is infallible and the opposition is led by crankpots, but the internet will become the main source of information for future generations of Singaporeans.
The regime is able to control the mainstream media in Singapore through SPH which is always headed by a former PAP minister, but can it do so in a lawless world without borders? Can SPH control Temasek Review, Kent Ridge Common and Mr Brown at the same time? Even if it is able to accomplish this near impossible feat, can it prevent a Singaporekini from arising in the future?
As the Malaysia political tsunami has adequately demonstrated, freedom of information is crucial to counter the pro-government mainstream media and to raise the political awareness of ordinary Malaysians.
Former Malaysia Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi admitted that the new media played a pivotal role in the opposition’s stunning success during the 2008 elections.
It should come as no surprise that all but one of the 11 parliamentary seats in the federal territory of Kuala Lumpur were won by the opposition which also managed to win the wealthiest state of Selangor. The urban population depends on online news media like Malaysiakini for their news which enable them to see through the chicanery and lies of the mainstream media.
Right now, the Temasek Review has exceeded the online readership of SPH’s New Paper, but we are still far away from knocking the big players like CNA off their perch. Only when we are able to achieve it can we exert a real impact on the ground.
That’s where we need you our readers to continue lending your support to our cause. This is a battle of David versus Goliath. Without a substantial war chest, it will be foolhardy to challenge SPH.
Though we are pretty small and unknown now, there are a few trends in our favor:
1. Due to political considerations, the state media will never be able to beat us in terms of in-depth political coverage and analysis. This is where we will constantly outwit and outfight them because no SPH editors will ever dare to write the truth without the fear of losing their jobs.
2. The entire world is moving towards greater political freedoms and pluralism. A one-party state with a Soviet-era media is out of sync with the modern world. Everywhere in Asia, dictatorships and dominant parties are falling out of power giving rise to multi-party democracies from Indonesia, South Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia and Japan. The young of tomorrow will be more politically aware, inclined and astute then present-day Singaporeans. The mainstream media will never be able to quench the intellectual thirst of these Singaporeans because it is created in the first place only to dish out state propaganda to preserve and perpetuate the hegemony of the regime.
3. The print media industry is in imminent decline in the face of constant onslaught from the new media with many established publications either forced to close down or wind down their operations, for instance FEER and Readers’ Digest. SPH is only able to keep its readership because people have no alternatives to choose from. Once they have a credible online alternative to turn to, they will flock to it en masse and SPH papers will be forced either to change its editorial stance or risk being rendered obsolete altogether. Since the 2008 elections in Malaysia which saw the opposition winning five states, the mainstream media is forced to moderate its previously pro-government stance to salvage their declining readership to the extent that MCA President Ong Tee Keat lambasted The Star (owned by MCA) for turning into an opposition mouthpiece.
Quality journalism deserves a price. Trained and experienced journalists must be paid at market rates. An internet newspaper needs constant support from its readers in order to continue growing and expanding. We cannot afford to stagnant at this crucial stage. We have to take off from here and become a full-fledged professional news site run not by amateurs bloggers but by trained journalists.
It is impossible to change the unfair laws placed by the regime to cripple the opposition, rebuild and unite the fragmented opposition to become a force to be reckon with overnight or to stop the constant police harassment of political activists, but right here we have a good chance of building the most important pillar of democracy – freedom of information.
Without a credible, strong and influential online newspaper to counter the daily lies, spins and propaganda of the mainstream media, we will never be able to free the minds of our fellow Singaporeans from the shackles that the ruling party has imposed on them for so long (yes, for far TOO LONG!) We will never be in a position to deny them their customary two-thirds majority in parliament for the next 50 years! Do you want another 50 years of one-party rule?
So, please help us by clicking on the “donate” button on the right hand bar. We have already upgraded our server to a dedicated server and will be spending money to acquire a few other sites in the near future. We want to bring more socio-political sites to attain our readership, in fact the more the merrier. When our company is incorporated, we will employ professional journalists to manage the site on a full-time basis. We will have to pay market rates in order to secure their services and all these need money.
Rome isn’t built in a day. We cannot expect Singaporeans to wake up from their long slumber immediately. The road ahead is long, arduous and full of dangers, but time is on our side. With patience, perseverance and a bit of luck, we believe we will reach our eventual destination. It may take us one, two, three or ten years, it doesn’t really matter. Your kind assistance and support will greatly help us to shorten the journey ahead.
4 Responses to “Singapore’s missing pillars of democracy (Part 3): Building the most important pillar right now”
Allan Ooi AWARE Chee Soon Juan Chiam See Tong Claire Lee David Widjaja DBS Dr Allan Ooi Dr Silviu Ionescu Dr Vivian Balakrishnan Foyce Le Xuan highnote5 Hong Lim Park Jack Lin Xinli Jack Neo Jack Neo affair Jack Neo scandal Josie Lau Josie Lau Meng Lee Kenneth Jeyaretnam Lee Kuan Yew Lehman brothers Lighthouse Evangelism MAS minibonds Miss Singapore World NTU stabbing PAP Pastor Rony Tan Ris Low Romanian diplomat in hit-and-run Rony Tan S-League silviu ionescu Singapore Singapore 2010 Youth Olympic Games Tan Kin Lian Thio Su Mien Tiger Woods affair Tong Kok Wai Top 8 Vivian Balakrishnan Wendy Chong Y O G Youth Olympic Games
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.








I hope TR could invite people like Francis Seow and TLH to be your consultant.
With the help of these two gentleman, TR will soon become the Malaysiakini of Singapore.
These two individuals can give valuable advice and they can be considered as politician in exile.
Perhaps they no longer care about this country and we have to consider giving up on them too.
let’s face it, ppl esp female are more interested in gossip, sports,food,entertainment etc. than politics
ris low news got more eyeballs than LKY:the strongmen
its human nature for only a minority to be interested in political affairs. the rest will only be concerned when their interests are being attacked.
As charlie munger says: appeal to ppl to their interests,not by reason.
harping on political unfairness will only make ppl like us interested but the rest simply bo-chap because they are not affected, their lives goes on.
you can say they are short-sighted, but human beings are famous for being short-sighted.
the day it arrives, the election dept must independently function out of the PM office.
the judiciary and the law society must be reinstated and held honourably by men and woman to remove all unjust laws to return its democratic rights for its citizens…
People are the fundamentals of democracy. The article raises some excellent points but restoring the seven pillars of democracy will not happen in such politically-stiff environment. Even if it does happen, history tells us that such political reforms are hardly going the right direction. There is an urgent need to increase political awareness among the younger generation. Political awareness that does not instill discontent towards the ruling party, as it is right now, but an unbiased and objective awareness of what is basically going on in your country.
During my stay in Singapore, I have witnessed my peers converting into cynics. When asked about their opinions of the ruling party and its members, their only discontent was the fact that the ruling party was dominating. This is a true sign of political immaturity- child-like hatred. These demographic group of the population will enter the workforce in 1 to 3 years time and very soon, we shall see a new generation viewing politics in a entirely erroneous perspective.
It is time to separate politics from PAP and it is time that Singaporeans, regardless of age and education, face the tough responsibility of being the enforcers of democracy. This is the time to return to the fundamentals- the people. Many lofty visions aim to “educate” Singaporeans in political issues but education itself has to have the proper foundations. When citizens regard themselves as politically active only when they oppose the ruling party, the country has a problem. When Singaporeans reject an excellent government in the name of politics, the country will have problems. Politics is not hatred towards the strong, it is a force to drive the country towards a better future. Pursuit of political vibrancy in the expense of politics is hardly a worthwhile trade-off. Singapore needs a population with objectivity and sanity. Only then can they read a newspaper without cynicism and only then can the entire population be united in one common objective- to create a better country.