Should universities be re-politicitized?
By Bhaskaran Kunju, Political Correspondent
At the Parliamentary sitting on August 18, Mr Viswa Sadasivan gave his maiden speech as a Nominated Member of Parliament.
The contents of his speech have already made headlines in just a few days, with even MM Lee providing his views. While most of the attention has been on the race debate, another aspect of Mr Viswa’s speech focused on the need for more participation in political activities for students, particularly those in Universities. It was one of three suggestions he had raised.
As an undergraduate studying Political Science in a local University, his comments rang a lot closer to home. Mr Viswa called on the government to encourage more political associations to be set up on campus to cultivate a vibrant political culture from a young age.
At present there is only one politically themed society functioning in my University- the Democratic Socialist Society. I do not think that will be of surprise to many. However, there are a large number of religious societies including Christian society called the Campus Crusaders. A number of campus publications also contain far more liberal views and opinions than any mainstream media.
Mr Viswa mentioned an encounter he had with an Undergraduate. He said,
“Recently, I met a young lady who had a good honours degree from a local university. She who didn’t know the difference between the President of Singapore and the Prime Minister. It is not just confounding but upsetting to be confronted by such realities! Something is very wrong here.”
Mr Viswa might have been surprised but facing such individuals in schools is a reality to me. This doesnot mean that they are unintelligent students. Given them the topic which they have studied. They’d be able to regurgitate whatever they’ve learnt. But there seems to be an inability to learn beyond their respective fields of interest, which often tend to be limited. I think, the basic awareness of politics or current affairs is not much to ask.
After all it is the driving force behind our socio-economic existence.
Mr Viswa placed the blame on the ineffective teaching of National Education and a non-existent political culture as a hindrance. Though these are two of the contributing factors, the education system in general is at fault as well. The students are required to mug up and attain good grades. The middle process of understanding and the end result of generating new ideas are missing.
The end result? We’re a nation that produces great workers by the masses, but not leaders. Not even thinkers. It is no surprise then there is always a complain of brain drain by the Government and a lack of capable leaders for our political or economical spheres. Yes, we are pushing towards a Knowledge Based Economy (KBE) but how compatible would it be for students who are the products of this education system. It has served us well though far over the decades but there is a need to retune the system.
As for a livelier political culture as mooted by Mr Viswa, I believe it will be a double-edged sword. What difference would political associations and activism on campus make if the students are apathetic to begin with? Yes, there will be those who may take it up on interest, but there is a need to factor into account that there lies a possibility that it will only result in political indifference being displaced by a cacophony of misinformation.
In my years in University I’ve seen far more invitations to student to organize parties and social events than any of political or intellectual values. It’s rather amusing for me to even think these students will be allowed to be active politically. There are far too many who are consumed by their lives and self-interest .
Of course, it will be unfair on my part to make a broad sweep and brush off all undergraduates as being incapable in taking part in political activity. There are a number who have surpassed mediocrity and shown the ability to be critical thinkers. I think given a chance, the political activism could work under a controlled environment. It would be interesting to see how students respond to political activism and I don’t think it will certainly lead to anarchy or chaos. The outcome could be a favourable one if enough time is given for the political culture to find its balance. It is understandable that there will be shaky beginnings but a moderated atmosphere could bear fruitful exchange of ideas in the long run. But there are better solutions to these problems of political apathy, which actually run a lot further than undergrads and youths in general. After all you don’t need to be politically active to have a vested interest in politics.
Mr Viswa mentions that the mainstream media needs to be “less sanitised and more politically engaging”. A more engaging mainstream media will definitely provide an outlet for political participation and still be under the control and purview of the government. This effectively allows for a dispersal of ideas and opinions that can still be controlled and maintained to weed out extremism. In other words a livelier and more stimulating media will not necessarily lead to the decimation of peace and order, but on the other hand be a valid platform for exchange of ideas and thoughts. I think as a society we have reached a point where the public in general has enough education and information to be able to hold discussions in a sanitised manner.
An unfavourable result of the restrictive nature of the mainstream media has, as pointed out by Mr Viswa, been the rise of “an underground culture that may not always be constructive.” He says this in reference to the online community of blogs and forums. I think that with a wider net of participation and ideas flowing in the mainstream idea, it could definitely dispel a lot of the cynicism and lowbrow engagement of ideas that are currently present at this level. Yes, I am aware of the medium this article is being published in but there are a lot of false sources of information that have taken up the mantle of purveyors of truth and justice. Not at all realising the further damage that baseless allegations could do to the credibility of the need for alternate voices.
Mr Viswa mentions youths as being particularly active in this medium and says he does not believe they are apathetic. But he does contradict himself in saying that people are generally politically apathetic. I’m not sure how he defines youths or what his sources are but I think most people of my age are busy blogging on their love life and selling clothes online. It is true that people in general are politically apathetic and he cites fear as a reason. I think, he has a point. The inherent fear that speaking up may only lead to persecution has driven those seeking to voice their views to do so from an anonymous platform. Which in my experience, even from school, has only drawn more cynicism and negativity with little productivity.
A lack of engaging and substantial political outlet on a mainstream platform has led to even the most nominal of our societal participation being displaced by the voices of the anonymous on the Internet. I don’t think this is ideal. The Government has over the years tried to reach out to youths in interesting ways. The most curious of all was when a group of young MPs took to performing hip-hop dance routines at the 2006 Chingay Parade. Mr Lam Pin Min the MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC said,
“All of us are having fun. It’s not important whether we perform well, we dance well or whether we look professional on tv or during the parade. Most importantly, we have to connect with the youths of today,”
Even if they meant well, I think what it only did was trivialise domestic politics. As a youth who voted for the first time that year I certainly did not think it was useful in any way. I hope the next attempt would not involve MPs dressing in Emo outfits and hanging out at Far East Plaza.
Other articles by Bhaskaran Kunju:
>> Why social cohesion is at the forefront of the Prime Minister’s National Day Rally
>> Changes in political system to allow more alternative voices
>> The untimely departure of Chip Goodyear
About the Author:
Bhaskaran Kunju is currently a political science undergraduate at a local varsity in Singapore.
19 Responses to “Should universities be re-politicitized?”
Alex Tan Allan Ooi AWARE Chee Soon Juan Chiam See Tong Claire Lee David Widjaja DBS Dr Allan Ooi Dr Silviu Ionescu Dr Vivian Balakrishnan Foyce Le Xuan highnote5 Hong Lim Park Jack Lin Xinli Jack Neo Jack Neo affair Jack Neo scandal Josie Lau Josie Lau Meng Lee Lee Kuan Yew Lehman brothers Lighthouse Evangelism MAS minibonds Miss Singapore World NTU stabbing PAP Pastor Rony Tan Ris Low Romanian diplomat in hit-and-run Rony Tan S-League silviu ionescu Singapore Singapore 2010 Youth Olympic Games Tan Kin Lian Thio Su Mien Tiger Woods affair Tong Kok Wai Top 8 Vivian Balakrishnan Wendy Chong Y O G Youth Olympic Games
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.








Dream on about change.
Beg the dictator.
Kneel down to him.
Say:
“Please give me some freedom, please give me…I want it so badly…”
I don’t see the point.
Why, would a person going to a university(and thus has something going for him or her, such as a better life than most people), piss their life away fighting for people who would never do the same if they were in his/her position. Let alone back him or her up.
In the US they have Civics 101 for understanding one’s role as citizens and understanding the political system and process. I was trying to recall if as we had something similar when we were in Primary or Secondary school. I remembered social studies but it seemed to only talk about historical events – colonisation, independence, not about our political process? Correct me if I am wrong. Have they have implemented more of civics in our current education system?
Not a single piece of the PAP machinery will change unless a significant number of opposition MPs are voted into parliament.
Anyone trying to do anything not approved by the PAP alone will just be shut down.
Hi All,
The reason why there is no attempt in building political awareness in schools is really simple – the PAP do no want youths to think too much on how Singapore should be governed!
When I was having a summer course in one university in China as an undergraduate, I was given an introductory talk on the politics of China. The lecturer explained to us how the executive, judiciary and legislative arms work in tandem under Communist rule.
I was baffled and shocked as I tried to analyse our own political system and way of governance but did not have a single clue then about how our Singapore political system was structured.
Furthermore, PAP have been aware that universities are hotbeds for reactive and revolutionary forces all over the world. Lee Kuan Yew has had enough of Nantah students asking for change, so it is inevitable that political stuff shall not have a place in young minds anymore.
Well-said well-said! And the campus crusade outfit can qualify as a political-cum-religious group on its own.
Yesterday, during the closing ceremony of the polytechnic forum 2009, my group presented on political apathy among youths. We proposed that a political education program, along with the continued cultivation of a media landscape (read further liberalization of media) would help address the problem of political apathy.
Some of the details of our proposed political education program are as follows:
Strictly non partisan
Aims to educate youths on the framework of the Singaporean government
Talks about democracy as a whole
Keeping with the theme of “youths as agents of change”, We were not pushing for political PARTICIPATION, but rather seeking to address the very real problem of ignorance of politics among youth, so that the future generation of Singaporeans would be more politically aware.
Minister Vivian Balakrishnan, who was the guest of honor, disagreed with us. He claimed that there was no political apathy among youths, and gave us examples such as “If tomorrow we were going to push out all indians in singapore, would you as youths do something?” The response was naturally a resounding yes, and he said “see? you are not apathetic”. He also warned against labeling youths as apathetic, saying it was “trendy” to do so.
The minister also said that he “Didn’t care that we did not know the nuts and bolts of the Government”, but rather was more concerned about “our beliefs”.
Personally, there were so many obvious flaws in his arguments, but it was a shame that I was too tired to go and rebut him.
2 week’s worth of thinking about Rights and Responsibilities, and trying to solve the base problem of apathy, has culminated in a 10cm long column in The Straits Times, saying that he has “reassured” us poly students.
I am not reassured. I think he had refused to see our point. I think he has completely gotten the wrong end of the stick, and had never engaged us on OUR PROPOSED IDEAS.
I have tried to be extremely objective about this account, save for the personal comments. What do you think?
Hi polystudent,
This is a classic PAP way of not addressing the problem – by ignoring its existence altogether and obfuscate the matter, in this case, by dragging in race and religion into the picture (as usual).
In this way, they do not even have to engage in a dialogue or debate because they know their flawed arguments will be seriously exposed, so why not avoid it altogether?
The only way to make these over-paid ministers wake up is through the ballot box.
Please expand on your points and write us an article. We’d love to give more voice to generation Y here.
With all these political indoctrination and oppression of dissenting views, what would be the NECESSARY outcome of generations of Singaporeans??
I know this offends but one expat puts it correctly in his blog. Singaporeans, he said…Singaporeans really are frustratingly stupid….don’t seem to be able to think for themselves….
…An absolute herd mentality.”
http://www.asiaone.com/Digital/News/Story/A1Story20090917-168487.html
It sure takes a foreigner to see so clearly what we are used to of herd mentality behaviour. It is even in political institutions of Government. No one ever queried publicly what is “wrong” or “strange” of our political thoughts, behaviour and even every day life after decades of being fed with a daily diet of “politically correct” news and information. Some of us don’t even know who we are anymore except griping around on little irritations of life and nothing about what is basically wrong on our society.
Sad.
Remember the Lee Bee Wah episode, VB and another mp in his ministry were very quiet on this matter while GCT, senior minister, said it was wrong publicly.
A lot of netizens post angry messages on the petition why VB and his partner was so inactively quiet. Obviously a politically aware and active citizenry is not the flavour of the month then. Is polystudent any surprised ???.
Yes indeed, i would love to do so. How would I go about doing it?
Hi Polystudent,
Just email your completed article to the editor at temasekreview@gmail.com
@Polystudent on Fri, 18th Sep 2009 8:09 am
“I am not reassured. I think he had refused to see our point.”
Since when has the govt ever taken our views (points) seriously?
When the idea of building the casinos was mooted, long before they announced the final decision, many people already knew the final outcome, that it’s a forgone conclusion.
“Public consultations”, engaging the citizens, etc, are only for wayangs.
Should universities be re-politicitized?
What a joke?
The local universities have been politicized from the beginning. The political scenes are very much similar to the national politics – domination by relations. Most if not all, except the FTs, top managers, deans, heads and directors are related somewhat to XXX. Some are not really qualified or the best available but just somebody. “Nobody” can be in that power base that can threaten the existing power base.
Why need to re-politicized again?
Hi Polystudent,
Your comment really surprised me. I’m surprised that Mr Vivian of all people would make such an ill informed remark. He was a well known youth activist in his days as President of the National University of Singapore Student Union. So for him to make such a comment is rather hypocritical. I’m glad to know that someone of your age group is aware of such issues. Sadly the mainstream media has it’s own editorial policies to abide by and that’s expected of a state controlled medium. I won’t say it’s right or wrong. But that’s where platforms such as Temasek Review come in useful in engaging in alternative views. Of course responsibility is of utmost importance. It would probably have been best had he been engaged on the spot over his comments. That way the issue would have been better clarified. I think like I said, breeding ignorance does more harm in cultivating leaders, something that has been a problem for our country for a long time. But don’t feel crushed and keep it up.
Bhaskaran
Claiming to be ‘un-political or de-politicised’ is probably the most politically loaded statement anyone can make.
“I don’t see the point.
Why, would a person going to a university(and thus has something going for him or her, such as a better life than most people), piss their life away fighting for people who would never do the same if they were in his/her position. Let alone back him or her up.”
It’d be nice if somebody replied to my post from a few days ago. I’d like to know if you would do the same if you were in a University students position.
Would you stick around and fight for the other guy? Or rather get a good job here, or even abroad?
Vivian B was the NUSSU President soon after it had been shut down thanks to Tan Wah Piow and Juliet Chin speaking up for retrenched workers. He was part of the transformation of NUSSU into a body that organises Jams and Hops and Tours.
Have to admit that I attended my share of Jams, Hops and Tours!
“Of course, it will be unfair on my part to make a broad sweep and brush off all undergraduates as being incapable in taking part in political activity. There are a number who have surpassed mediocrity and shown the ability to be critical thinkers.”
Dear Bhaskaran,
I think we all know to which group you think you belong.
But tell me, what do you understand by political activism, particularly within a university setting? You should elaborate.
Oh, wait! I see a big, grand room. Above the garlanded door hangs a banner which reads “Society of Singaporean Undergraduates against Political Apathy.” The day’s activity? A talk-shop for undergrads to regurgitate their readings of Hobbes and Locke, and maybe, a bit of the Motorcycle Diaries and Foucault for the more fashionably-inclined among you.
Oh, how exciting!
Give me Zouk any day of the week. Hell, even Jam & Hop will do.