Focusing on “Focus On The Family”: An export of American-style”Christian Nationalism”
By Dogemperor, Guest Columnist
[DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this article belong to the columnist entirely and do not represent that of this site. Please email the author at dogemperor.dkos@gmail.com if you have any queries]
In <read here> an earlier post on Wayang Party, I focused on a particular “Christian nationalist” movement–the New Apostolic Reformation, often known as “Joel’s Army” or “Elijah’s Army” and the threat the NAR poses to religious tolerance and diversity in Singapore as well as the potential threat to national security.
Today, we focus on the other part of the “Christian Nationalist” equation in Singapore–Focus on the Family and its Singaporean division as well as its American “mother ship”.
A brief history of “Focus”
Focus on the Family started out in California in 1977, during a period of <read here (Part-2)”>widescale
targeting of the primary conservative political party in the US and generally increased political activism by what is known now as the “Religious Right”.
Its founder, Dr. James Dobson, specialised originally in being essentially a “Christian alternative” to the writings of childcare expert Dr. Benjamin Spock. Rather than Spock’s analytical approach to childrearing (where he advocated using child psychology to work with kids), Dobson very much promoted a <read here> “tough love” approach which included in its signature book “The Strong-Willed Child” the description of <read here> flogging a Dachshund (who
had apparently committed the unpardonable sin of refusing to get into his bed and who was resting on the toilet seat) as an example of how children’s wills should be broken:
“But this is not a book about the discipline of dogs; there is an important moral to my story that is highly relevant to the world of children. JUST AS SURELY AS A DOG WILL OCCASIONALLY CHALLENGE THE AUTHORITY OF HIS LEADERS, SO WILL A LITTLE CHILD — ONLY MORE SO.”
“[I]t is possible to create a fussy, demanding baby by rushing to pick him up every time he utters a whimper or sigh. Infants are fully capable of learning to manipulate their parents through a process called reinforcement, whereby any behavior that produces a pleasant result will tend to recur. Thus, a healthy baby can keep his mother hopping around
his nursery twelve hours a day (or night) by simply forcing air past his sandpaper larynx.”
In addition to describing flogging dogs, he advocates <read here> flogging children as young as 1 1/2 years old with whips they are forced to select themselves until the children are weeping; in another book (”The New Dare to Discipline”) he lovingly recalls being literally flogged by his mother with a girdle and <read here> essentially blames the entire decline and fall of Western civilisation and Christendom on parents not sufficiently beating their kids.
In large part, “Focus” started out as a media outlet for selling Dobson’s books; to this day, as we’ll see, the sale of his books is still a major source of income (as well as the rest of his rather large media empire).
Unlike its “daughter-ship” in Singapore, Focus on the Family organised itself in a rather unusual fashion for “religious right” groups in the US–instead of establishing itself as an educational foundation, <read here> it literally incorporated with the US tax authorities and California state government as a religious corporation — the same legal method used to establish a parachurch group not linked to an official denomination, or the method used to start a new religious denomination. (Of note: California has very easy laws to do this compared to most US states; in
much of the US, one must have a congregation of a minimum size to incorporate as a religious group not affiliated to a pre-existing denomination.)
Eventually, Focus moved to Colorado Springs, Colorado–a town that is regarded as the de facto capital of the “Christian Nationalist” movement in the United States (a large number of groups, including C. Peter Wagner’s “World Prayer Center”, call Colorado Springs home; there is some evidence to suggest the town may have been rather explicitly targeted by the “religious right”).
In 1981, Focus founded the first of its lobbying wings–Family Research Council–which was forced to split off in the late 80s due to the American tax authorities investigating complaints of illegal electioneering. (Both Focus and Family Research Council were organised under sections of US nonprofit law that prohibit endorsement of candidates or specific bills in legislatures.) Focus promptly founded a new lobbying wing–Focus on the Family Action–which operates now under its <read here> CitizenLink name and publishes “Citizen Magazine”.
FotF: Where “Christian Nation” nonsense is Big Business
Focus has also grown considerably. At their peak, Focus pulled in <read here> close to US$145 million (S$211.5 million); profits are down to around US$97 million (S$141.5 million) as of 2006 but from the period of 2000-2005 <read here> Focus pulled in US$552,002,190 (S$805.15 million) with over US$496 million (S$723.47 million) in donations. (Of note: “short” millions are being used here–aka “milliards” outside of the US and UK.)
By far, Focus is the wealthiest “religious right” group in the US, and also quite possibly the one with the most extensive media empire. In addition to Dobson’s books and Citizen Magazine, Focus on the Family operates a radio network for “Christian” talk radio stations in the US; this includes children’s programming including the “Adventures in Odyssey” radio serial programme, which <read here> promote “God Warrioring” to the elementary school set.
Focus also has a considerable commercial sponsor–namely, <read here> the Chick-Fil-A “Southern chicken sandwich” chain of restaurants who not only are a major corporate sponsor of FotF but also include Focus on the
Family-related children’s meal incentives.
The radio programs meant for “Religious right” audiences cover over 2000 radio stations total worldwide, and it is not an exaggeration to state <read here> Focus’ radio empire probably covers every “religious right” friendly station in North America.
In addition to his radio network servicing “Christian talk” radio, Dobson also has a newspaper column carried in hundreds of US newspapers (under a “parenting advice” column) as well as radio spots carried on over 300 secular radio stations in the US.
As we’ll see, it’s primarily the info targeted at secular audiences (where Dobson is pretty much promoted as merely standing up for keeping families safe from adult material as well as being a childrearing agony columnist)–just as is in the case in Singapore, where Focus is registered as a secular nonprofit–where unsuspecting families get
recruited into the “religious right” content.
Focus and its habit of hiding its agenda
Partly because of the strength of the “religious right” in the States, Focus is remarkably more open about its Stateside operations than it is in Singapore. However, it does tend to vary in regards to the level of openness.
The rough equivalent to Focus Singapore’s site in the States is <read here> Focus On Your Child, which promotes itself as a parenting resource. Even here, though, it’s remarkably more open about the religious content, and all of two clicks note <read here> a heavy emphasis on the “reparative therapy” and “degaying” industries — including claims there is somehow a “gay agenda” to destroy Christendom.
Another similarly stealthy front is a site called <read here> Drug Proof Your Kids — this tends to be a fairly major recruitment front here in the US, due to fears of drug abuse among teenagers.
Focus in the US tends to also focus not only on “tough love” childrearing but also relationship advice. Its <read here> Love Won Out page is focused solely on trying to “de-gay” people and promoting “de-gaying” therapy (which,
at least in the US, is almost universally regarded by mainstream psychiatric, psychological and social work orgs as not only flatly impossible but dangerously harmful to the mental health of the “de-gayee”); this includes promotion of <read here> “religious right” groups that are promoted as <read here>”Christian alternatives” to “worldly” legitimate mental health and social services.
We also get a glimpse at something else that Focus does very well indeed–the “astroturf” letter-writing campaign, in which thousands of angry letters can be sent to legislators and city councilpersons and boards of education by merely the click of a mouse button or a notification through an email alert.
FotF Action CitizenLink <read here> has a specific section for “legislative alerts”. One example is <read here> their
efforts to try to derail US Congressional approval of the Matthew Shephard Act (a bill that would formally add crimes against LGBT people to the category of “hate crimes” subject to additional legal penalties; the bill is named after a young man who was viciously beaten and dragged to his death because he was gay). It’s likely that similar “alert chains” are in use in Singapore re the attempts to get AWARE’s educational materials removed from Singapore schools.
Focus on the Family Action also operates a <read here> petition page — technically the only form of lobbying they are allowed to do under their particular tax code exemption.
One of the surprising areas where Focus lobbies–at least it’s surprising for a group supposedly concerned about families and children — is working to prevent laws that would protect kids from abusive parents. Dobson is one of <read here> an entire collective of “religious right” promoters who actively work to scuttle existing laws preventing child abuse in the US.
In addition, Focus on the Family is one of the major lobbying groups that is <read here> responsible for the US being the sole country with a functional government that has not ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child
(Somalia does at least have the excuse that the country is in a de facto state of anarchy); as if this weren’t shameful enough, <read here> works to get other countries to drop ratification. (Of note, the Convention is one of the most powerful tools in use to stop child abuse in countries without strong anti-abuse laws; the international NGO <read here> RISE International uses it as a primary tool to stop religiously motivated child abuse and neglect.) The US is, by far, not the only country in which Focus actively tries to scuttle child abuse laws–<read here> its New Zealand
affiliate is particularly active in this as well.
Another surprising area is promotion of <read here>”Christian Worldview Investing” — that is, doing banking and funding based on a litmus test on how “Christian Nationalist” a company is. This includes being explicitly anti-environmentalist; in fact, <read here> Dobson led a purge of the leadership of the main ecumenical body for
evangelicals in the US because its leader promoted a “Christianised” green movement called “Creation Care”.
Digging deeper, we find more info on Focus’s true agenda — especially with some of its more obscure sub-orgs.
One of the big Focus divisions is a group called the <read here> Alliance Defense Fund. ADF promotes itself as essentially a “Christian alternative” to mainstream civil rights organisations (like the American Civil Liberties Union) and focuses largely on trying to set pro-”religious right” legal precedents in the US courts. One of the big things they push are what are euphemistically termed “Defense of Marriage Acts”–laws that prohibit not only same-sex couples from marriage but legal recognition of marriages in areas where they are legal and even “domestic partnerships” and contracts that give the same legal benefits as marriages.
In addition, one thing they love filing lawsuits on (and which becomes particularly relevant re the current problems AWARE has with the MOE) are <read here> matters relating to any form of sex education at all in schools. (It’s
probably right here that the protesters are taking notes from, by the way.) In essence, they try to get “religious right” laws in place <read here> via court precedents.
The <read here> allies section, particularly the <read here“> educational section, lists (among other things) a law school run by televangelist Pat Robertson and a group called Wallbuilders which promotes <read here> a version of American history that can be termed, quite frankly, “Christian Nationalist revisionism”. (Wallbuilders, of note, also has some <read here> notable links to Joel’s Army groups including those who promote paramilitary activity in the US.)
ADF itself promotes Campus Crusade for Christ (as well as CCC front Intervarsity Christian Fellowship), Crown
Ministries (a “Christian investment” scheme) and Bill Gothard’s “Institute in Basic Life Principles”–all three of which may be considered NAR groups, and Gothard’s group in particular linked to literal “Joel’s Army with Guns”–<read here> on its “ministries” page (along with lesser-known NAR-linked groups Generation X-Cel, a second “marketplace evangelism”/”wealth transfer” NAR group called <read here> Fellowship of Companies for Christ International.
Of particular note to the Singaporean situation, it appears <read here> ADF explicitly operates internationally; most of its operations seem to be in <read here> Canada and Europe but the possibility a base may be established in
Singapore can’t be discounted. One thing ADF tends to be heavy in promoting is <read here> the bogus concept that somehow the US is not bound by international laws and treaties and calling for countries to pull out of international
treaty orgs.
Much like FotF Action, they also <read here> promote letter-writing campaigns including “astroturfing” news opinion columns and legislator and judicial mailboxes.
Far less well publicised, but notable in the nonprofit “tax exemption” forms for Focus, is a group called <read here> The Truth Project — in essence, Truth Project is Focus on the Family’s own branded “pyramid scheme” of cell-churches, in which people <read here> are indoctrinated into “God Warrioring” in similar manner to NAR groups.
In fact, there’s evidence NAR groups may have directly influenced Focus (less in the terms of “steeplejacking” and more in terms of “strategic partnerships”); <read here> Ravi Zacharias explicitly endorses the project, and the head of “Truth Project” <read here> has links to steeplejacked Presbyterian churches (specifically a group called
Presbyterian Church in America which has <read here> been taken over in a steeplejacking by “Christian Nationalist” groups connected with neo-Confederate secessionist orgs); Truth Project’s head <read here> was himself recruited into a “cell church” group whilst in the US Air Force (itself an organisation with some fairly major problems with
NAR-linked operatives massively infiltrating the armed forces).
It’s finally with the “Truth Project” that we get to the real “truth” of what Focus is promoting–<read here> mass conversion to “Religious right” theology and “Christian nationalism”.
About the author:
[I'm located in the US (and as for nationality--American of largely Cherokee and Irish descent). I've been published on Talk to Action(http://www.talk2action.org/user/dogemperor) and DailyKos (http://dogemperor.dailykos.com), and am presently part of a new research team focusing primarily on "religious right" groups connected to "Joel's Army"; I am also presently working as a consultant/co-author with Leah Burton, whom has recently published a book called "Theopalinism" regarding Sarah Palin's connections with Joel's Army
(among other things). I am also in the preparatory stages of writing a book on domestic violence within "religious right" groups including, notably, religiously motivated child abuse.
As for my work--well, since roughly 2005 I've been doing freelance research and education on "religious right" groups both in the US and abroad. (My backgrounder on this: I grew up in one of the fifteen largest NAR/Joel's Army churches in the United States and eventually left when I found out I'd been extensively lied to and manipulated. Many experts on cults in the US and Australia now consider the group I left, and the movement it's a part of, a "Bible-based coercive group".)
I do tend to post pseudonymously because the particular group I walked away from has a documented history of harassing not only critics but family members of critics, and the church I left is part of an anti-LGBT
hate group that has promoted Holocaust revisionism and violence against LGBT people.]
23 Responses to “Focusing on “Focus On The Family”: An export of American-style”Christian Nationalism””
Alex Tan Allan Ooi AWARE Chee Soon Juan Chiam See Tong Claire Lee David Widjaja DBS Dr Allan Ooi Dr Silviu Ionescu Dr Vivian Balakrishnan Foyce Le Xuan highnote5 Hong Lim Park Jack Lin Xinli Jack Neo Jack Neo affair Jack Neo scandal Josie Lau Josie Lau Meng Lee Lee Kuan Yew Lehman brothers Lighthouse Evangelism MAS minibonds Miss Singapore World NTU stabbing PAP Pastor Rony Tan Ris Low Romanian diplomat in hit-and-run Rony Tan S-League silviu ionescu Singapore Singapore 2010 Youth Olympic Games Tan Kin Lian Thio Su Mien Tiger Woods affair Tong Kok Wai Top 8 Vivian Balakrishnan Wendy Chong Y O G Youth Olympic Games
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.








Dogemperor? More like dog’s dinner. What does it all mean? Lots of sound and fury, signifying … not much at all. Admin, how can? By the way, all stories should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. Otherwise, we don’t have a bloody clue what you are all talking about.
But it does remind me of live TV news whenever Americans are interviewed. They’re asked by a TV reporter what they saw (of some important event), and spend 45 seconds talking about what they ate for breakfast that morning at the coffeeshop across the road. You can almost feel the producers skirming in their seats debating whether to cut straight to commercial. ‘Love to hear the sound of their own voices’ springs to mind.
Very interesting and informative article. Thanks for your effort.
COOS was not the only one subverting Aware. FOTF Singapore was also involved, albeit in the background.
Below is a email leak in sgboy – http://www.trevvy.com/sgboyx/index.php?showtopic=30638
You can see that FOTF singapore is actively calling for “concened” christians to write in to the police to stop a gay picnic.
Im sure Dogemperor will referred to this as another tactic of the dominionist, christian right.
————————————————-
FW: For your information
Derek HONG to COOS, cscc, eugene, graman, lawchua, visioncity, rswd2
From: Derek HONG
To: COOS English Church Staff – DL
cccscc@pacific.net.sg,
eugene@touch.org.sg,
graman@pacific.net.sg,
lawchua@lsbc.org.sg,
visioncity@pacific.net.sg,
rswd2@yahoo.com.sg
Date: Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:20 PM
Subject: FW: For your information
Hi everyone
Please alert our friends and members to register their concern with the MHA.
God bless
Derek
From: Tan Thuan Seng [mailto:thuanseng@family.org.sg]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 2:12 PM
To: ‘Mary Loh’
Cc:Derek HONG
Subject: RE: For your information
Hi Mary,
Thanks for the alert. Regrettably its not the first time as its part of their “’Indignation”’ activities that they organize to coincide with National Day. I will lodge a complaint with MHA but perhaps you should also register your concern as it may be helpful for more people to write to the Police or MHA. If they have a good turnout and try to turn it into an impromptu Speakers Corner the police may take action to break it up.
Tan Thuan Seng | Chairman| T (65) 6336 1444 | M 9430 5345 | http://www.family.org.sg
9, Bishan Place, #08-03, Junction 8 Office Tower, Singapore 579837
—–Original Message—–
From: Mary Loh [mailto:kwuanloh@pacific.net.sg]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 12:20 PM
To: Tan Thuan Seng
Cc:Derek Hong
Subject: For your information
Dear Thuan Seng
You may wish to alert the relevant authorities that the gay community are planning a unofficial “Pink Picnic” at Botanic Gardens on National Day from 4.30 – 6.30 pm next to the symphony stage. I was unwittingly invited.
Regards
Mary
Dear Dogemperor
Well done for keeping the “rest of us” well informed of the dangers lurking in our midst!
So many ignoramus fanatic christians are NOT aware how this extreme “western” form of christianity is destroying traditional chinese families! Especially when parents of christian children are less educated and not english-educated!
I have heard that children, of Myanmar parents living in Singapore, who are converted to christianity in schools, are also disrupting “traditional” asian family be viewing traditional practices as “satanic”.
To Peter: My apologies if the writing did sound like self-aggrandisement; my point in the writing was to document the tactics that Focus on the Family has used both in the US and abroad for recruitment and promotion of a “Christian nationalist” agenda (which, in many countries, involves quite a bit of subterfuge).
It’s also my personal hope that this may lead to further research on the specific network FotF Singapore is using.
Malcolm in the Middle: You’d be right–this is pretty much a typical “religious right” attack, and often things like counterprotests and attempts to scuttle LGBT meetings, organise campaigns to ban books, and the like are organised via email networks.
Focus on the Family and other political “Christian Nationalist” groups here in the States tend to have email mailinglists that can be subscribed to; this info also tends VERY much to be passed along via cell-church networks (which also minimises the size of the mailinglist to be maintained).
In the case of COOS, the FotF involvement is actually expected; Focus would appear to be the primary “political Christian Nationalist” group in Singapore, though a little more “stealthed” than usual, and this does fit the pattern in American and Australian NAR-linked churches of housing a state affiliate or small national-affiliate “political” group that is affiliated with a larger group but also acts as the “political” wing of the NAR church in question.
(To give some minor examples: Hillsong Community Church essentially runs Family First as its “political wing” in Australia, and different NAR churches in my particular state run state affiliates of Focus on the Family and American Family Association (a different “Christian Nationalist” political group that is not terribly active overseas but is quite active here, especially in regards to censorship attempts of the media and anti-LGBT organising). This pattern tends to be repeated in just about every state in the US; most of the state affiliates tend to be housed in (at least) “Christian Nationalist” churches (primarily Southern Baptist or “independent Christian Church” for Focus, primarily NAR-linked churches for AFA) as their de facto headquarters, and often the leaders of state affilates tend to be deacons in their “home churches”.)
i can’t believe that picnic is not allowed because gay sex orientation is considered as unnatural. can someone define what is considered unnatural? if anything that does not lead to creation of baby is considered as unnatural, then wearing condom and masturbation must be considered as crime as well. these bunch of ultra right wing christians are totally hypocrites
Actually, I remember our Government consistently shutting down outdoor events that hint a pro gay theme, like the Snowball parties and the previous Pink cycle. The latter ended rather comically with the police trailing the participants as they disperesed.
Yes, the government still considers any movement to heighten the gay profile in Singapore as undesirable. The PAP is conservative to the core. The only difference between the PAP and the conservative Christians is the religion factor.
Remember how they fined Mediacorp for showing a gay couple on a show nobody watches? Why are you acting surprised if the Govt kills Pink Dot?
FotF is really tame here. Never seen anything remotely “Christian Nationalist” or pro-corporal-punishment in its articles.
When these Christian Taliban claim to love the sinner but not the sin, I knew it was BS right away.
Now, it has been proven – they can’t even let gays gather for a picnic.
I don’t know anyone gay but this sort of bullying a minority group offends me. This is not the Singapore I want to see.
Interesting article. I see from the FOTF international website “timeline” the number of countries they have a foothold in is staggering. They established in Singapore the same year as Egypt, of all places!
Going back to the issue of sex education in Singapore, as FOTF is also an outsourced provider, like AWARE, and as all providers have reportedly been suspended, I wonder if the FOTF package is also suspended and under scrutiny? Given their affiliations maybe it should be.
To Dogemperor,
Will it be helpful if you can link up with religion research groups in S’pore to find out more on the linkages between the ’secular’ organisations and religion organisations related to the NAR group. These research groups may possess more detailed information than the general public.
I know there is one religion research cluster in NUS. You may contract them by email – fassreligion@nus.edu.sg
bah: its called “wolf in sheep clothing” strategy. First, show everyone that common Christian values are applicable to all people, regardless of your background. Second, gain a foothold in society by being influential and politically connected, or for that matter, be elected into office. Lastly, once you have the numbers, through partnerships or worse, be successful in converting the masses into Christianity, you launch your final assault by establishing theocracy in Singapore.
Thanks for this wonderful (though long) article. From a Singaporean perspective, I won’t call FOTF and COOS “Christian Nationalists”. Instead, they are Christian Neo-colonialists or Lackeys of Bush-Imperialists who want to impose the extreme views of George W Bush’s imperialist doctrines on Asian and other nations. As Singaporean secularists, we should resist such erosion of our national right and identity.
Hi Alwin Loi:
Re: “i can’t believe that picnic is not allowed because gay sex orientation is considered as unnatural.”
That was an abuse of power by the police at the behest of the Christian Taliban that is esconced within the PAP; the police considered it an illegal assembly citing a law – itself unconstitutional, and therfore unlawful – that prohibits any assembly of more than four people.
But we know that both the PAP and their police agents they use to commit crimes against Singaporeans are severly deficient when it comes to legitimate governamnce; forgive them, for they are just the vilage elders of an isolated mountain village coming into contact with civilization for the first time.
The definition of “assembly” should strictly apply only to political activity, and not social or recreational ones like the Pink Picnic, even if the participants share the same political outlook. Otherwise, they would have to arrest hundreds of thousands of Singaporeans on a daily basis.
As I mentioned in the “steeplejacking” thread, I was at the very forefront of the 2007 debates particularly on the much surveilled SBF and eventually won many allies ansd supporters.
Some of us decided – very openly in SBF, BECAUSE we knew we were being monotored online – to retaliate by reporting heterosexual picture-taking wedding parties at parks, Old City Hall/the Supreme Court etc.
To cut a long story short, the picnic was eventually allowed because of the action that we were threatening.
But not without the ISD and/or undercover police to keep the picnickers company in the background.
Bah: As I’ve noted, FotF is keeping very much “under the radar” in Singapore–they incorporated as a secular NGO in Singapore (in the US and most other countries, they’re registered as a religious NGO of some time–in the US, they’re in fact legally considered a nondenominational ministry) and there is little available on their websites.
As Focus is known to operate rather similarly with at least two of its fronts in the US (their “Drug Proof Your Child” front in particular and the “Focus On Your Child” group to a lesser extent), it’s likely there’s a political dominionist group (similar to FotF Action or especially Alliance Defense Fund) in operation. (There are some rather strong indications, based on numerous reports involving the AWARE saga and attempts to scuttle LGBT meetings, that COOS’ “email chain” may in fact be operating as the de facto “FotF Action Singapore”; this would also fit with what would be an apparent love of “stealthing” by NAR and “Christian Nationalist” groups in Singapore in general.)
Like Bam Bam noted, it is pretty much classic “wolf in sheep’s clothing”, with a lot of “bait and switch” too.
Alwin Loi: Actually, these groups DO tend to disapprove of contraception–one big thing Focus is known for here in the US is pushing “abstinence only” sex-ed courses that claim that condoms and other birth control methods have high rates of failure, etc. They’ve also pushed for bans on hormonal birth control methods in practice (via “pharmacist refusal” laws and “conscience clause” laws (meant originally so that doctors and Catholic hospital systems didn’t have to participate in surgical abortion) and a creative claim of claiming hormonal birth control causes abortion) and requiring age checks for purchase of condoms and diaphragms.
(Of note–as far out as this is, FotF in the States is probably the least extreme of the “Christian Nationalist” groups in this regard. A lot of NAR groups here promote something called “QuiverFull”–the concept you are supposed to have as many babies as possible and raise them in highly restrictive manner as “God Warriors”; even the rhythm method and natural family planning is seen as a sin in these groups. (There’s a quote from the movie “Braveheart” that sums up the philosophy: “If we can’t burn them out, we’ll breed them out.”))
Concern: Thanks for the linkage–I do think it would be helpful.
Anonymous: This would also be interesting to know–partly because in the US there has been a tendency (in part due to “moral panic” pushes re LGBT people by Focus and other “Christian Nationalist” groups) to start banning student clubs in high schools altogether in efforts to lock out “Gay/Straight Alliance” groups (as the courts have ruled here you can’t discriminate against groups, they have to allow all or none); they’ve on occasion also tried this on college campuses as well.
The result does block the “Bible clubs”, but the “religious right” is fine with this as long as it blocks the LGBT-friendly and LGBT-supportive student-run clubs. (Part of me wonders whether this in fact may not have been a deliberate strategy to either scuttle sex-ed altogether in Singapore or the rough equivalent of a political “suicide bombing”.)
Hi dogemperor:
Re: “Even here, though, it’s remarkably more open about the religious content, and all of two clicks note a heavy emphasis on the “reparative therapy” and “degaying” industries…”
You probably already know this but for the benefit of readers who may not, the Chioces Ministry of COOs is based directly on FotF’s (US) Exodus, the name of their gay reparative therapy program(ming).
What has thus far not been visible in Singapore and to Singaporeans are the psycho-ed up products of the program. I recall some very scary individuals who were featured prominently in the States who are also products of this program(ming).
Here, I have suspicions that that have been some, but only online. And they have never intimated anything about the program – in fact for all intents and purposes, they presented as straight, and not even ex-gay. Nothing concrete to go by for me.
Hi Dogemperor,
Thanks for the article. Good hearing it from someone with expertise.
BTW, I’m not sure if you are aware that a Singapore newspaper, Today, under a local television and media monopoly, Mediacorp, has been carrying James Dobson’s Focus on the Family column for some years now. Today is the second largest circulating newspaper and has a reach of about 600,000, mostly working adults as the newspaper is given out at train stations during the rush hour. James Dobson’s column appears to be endorsed by the Academy of Certified Counsellors and Specialist Diploma in Teaching & Supporting Children with Special Needs. The content of his articles is moderate and focuses on building relationships with children. Should the average reader not know the origins & background of FOTF, he might be misled into thinking that the writer is moderate and writes from a secular point of view.
I was with CCC in one of the local universities briefly and from what I know, CCC is established in several campuses other than my own. The members and mentor take a rather balanced approach but are nonetheless didactic. This is one of their websites: http://www.everystudent.com/sg/index.html
My conjecture is that many CCC members are unaware of their organization’s affliations with ADF, participating in CCC because they are looking for a place to interact with fellow Christians. I’m not sure of the level of the autonomy the Singapore CCC has but they either hide their fundamental agenda superbly, skimming the Christian and secular market in Singapore before penetrating the market(Josie Lau’s attempt to target women). Or they do not share the same objectives as America’s ADF or NAR groups. Feel free to enlighten me, for I’m unfamiliar with these Christian movements.
Keep writing!
Focus on the Family Singapore has a public association with the popular chain of children’s indoor playgrounds, Go-Go Bambini. According to the website of Go-Go Bambini (www.gogobambini.com/about-go-go-bambini), they disseminate FOTF materials at their premises. They also display collection boxes for FOTF.
I have written to Go-Go Bambini asking them to justify their support for this extemist organization, and I’d like to suggest that other parents do the same. Yes, we all have the option to not patronise Go-Go Bambini, but it would help to let them know WHY we are concerned about their choice of charity partner.
Natasha: This sounds remarkably similar to American chain Chick-Fil-A’s support of Focus (right down to the kid’s meals incentives)–as Truett Cathy (owner of Chick-Fil-A) is known to be a member of FotF and a major corporate funder, it’s (sadly) probable that there may be something similar going on here.
One good thing to look into is if the CEO of Go-Go Bambini is linked to other right-wing and especially “Christian Nationalist” groups as well, or has records of support for them. (And as it turns out, there are links to World Vision, a charity that has been under some scrutiny in the US for possible links to “religious right” groups and prosyletisation of children.)
One thing that is particularly worrisome to me is the fact that Go-Go Bambini has very little info out on its founder or its corporate contacts at all. (Usually companies are quite happy to list the board of directors, even companies that operate via franchises like Go-Go Bambini.) This in and of itself may be a warning flag–or at least a sign they’re trying to hide something.
I remember the gay-picnic-being-banned thing mentioned on the MrBrown show before.
Basically, if anyone complain anything to the police, the mata also lan-lan have to take action. If you were the one wearing the uniform, this kind of police action is basically EXTRA WORK just to appease members of the public.
A metanalysis:
Maybe its just the way I am, but sometimes I just withdraw emotionally from the insanity of the whole issue and wonder…what does FOTF hope to achieve? Harping constantly on homosexuals and getting into endless struggles over whether it is right or wrong…surely this is also a drain on the organisations’ own manpower and funds?
Rather than, as it claims, to be able to help families…by focusing solely on issues that are not controversial at all. Aid for single/disabled parents. Helping children with terminal illnesses. Ensuring that the elderly who live alone have someone to care for and check on them. True, they claim to do these sorts of things, but if the homosexual issue brings them so much opposition, won’t they gain more support by dealing with just the REAL problems in society? AND free up more funds?
If a conservative, Christian organisation openly declared themselves and then set up a welfare group for any of the noble causes above, mainstream society would laud and respect them.
Throwing funds and work hours at homosexuality is wasteful and inefficient. So why is FOTF still doing it?
Natasha on Fri, 15th May 2009 11:02 am “they disseminate FOTF materials at their premises. They also display collection boxes for FOTF.”
I see they also have a discount/promotional link with DBS on their website. Coincidence?
[...] Focusing on “Focus on the family”: an export of American-style Christian Nationalism by [...]