<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why there is no &#8216;Malaysiakini&#8217; in Singapore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/</link>
	<description>The Voice of Singapore from Singaporeans for Singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:10:43 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yellow Earth</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-17116</link>
		<dc:creator>Yellow Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-17116</guid>
		<description>For those who are NOT familiar with Malaysian and Singaporean history, DAP is the left-wing Malaysian branch of the PAP when it contested seats while Singapore was in the Malaysian federation. 

And for those not familiar with current Malaysian politics and have not read the Malaysiakini itself, don&#039;t let its self proclaimed image as an independent and unbiased online newspaper fool you. Malaysiakini is an opposition newspaper and regards its DAP biased propoganda as the absolute truth and will not run articles and editorials critical of the DAP, but does not exclude critizing its allies the PKR and the PAS. If Malaysiakini were to be scrutinized as other alternative news sources in the West, many of its more senationalist claims pertaining to racism and corruption would expose its own lack of journalistic integrity with regards to verifiable evidence and its own political biasedness. An incident that readily comes to mind is the infamous Nude Squat Gate, where photos of an apparently naked Chinese woman held in police custody was disseminated by the DAP in the Chinese dailies and Malaysiakini as evidence of RACIAL and sexual abuse by the police. When investigated throughly, it was discovered that the woman was actually a Malay, and the MP in question (Theresa Kok) tried to cover her blunder by saying that the dissemination of the photo was actually to highlight police abuse, which is a seperate issue and NOT the DAP&#039;s goal to begin with, no matter how they want to whitewash the issue. 

Does this pattern of behaviour sound familar to you? 

In short, Malaysiakini could be a template for the Straits Times when it becomes the opposition in Singapore. With regards to the DAP, the foreign press always fail to mention that, unlike the PAP, it does not have a single Malay MP and its ideology is that of socialist democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who are NOT familiar with Malaysian and Singaporean history, DAP is the left-wing Malaysian branch of the PAP when it contested seats while Singapore was in the Malaysian federation. </p>
<p>And for those not familiar with current Malaysian politics and have not read the Malaysiakini itself, don&#8217;t let its self proclaimed image as an independent and unbiased online newspaper fool you. Malaysiakini is an opposition newspaper and regards its DAP biased propoganda as the absolute truth and will not run articles and editorials critical of the DAP, but does not exclude critizing its allies the PKR and the PAS. If Malaysiakini were to be scrutinized as other alternative news sources in the West, many of its more senationalist claims pertaining to racism and corruption would expose its own lack of journalistic integrity with regards to verifiable evidence and its own political biasedness. An incident that readily comes to mind is the infamous Nude Squat Gate, where photos of an apparently naked Chinese woman held in police custody was disseminated by the DAP in the Chinese dailies and Malaysiakini as evidence of RACIAL and sexual abuse by the police. When investigated throughly, it was discovered that the woman was actually a Malay, and the MP in question (Theresa Kok) tried to cover her blunder by saying that the dissemination of the photo was actually to highlight police abuse, which is a seperate issue and NOT the DAP&#8217;s goal to begin with, no matter how they want to whitewash the issue. </p>
<p>Does this pattern of behaviour sound familar to you? </p>
<p>In short, Malaysiakini could be a template for the Straits Times when it becomes the opposition in Singapore. With regards to the DAP, the foreign press always fail to mention that, unlike the PAP, it does not have a single Malay MP and its ideology is that of socialist democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-16591</link>
		<dc:creator>Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-16591</guid>
		<description>To Outsider.

&quot;Singapore does not need a Singaporekini because there really is no need for one. Singapore Press Holdings’ journalists are top-notch and their reports on Malaysia are sought even by Malaysians who seek alternative media and - of course - the truth. Singapore may be ruled by one political party with an iron fist at times but what’s wrong with that as long as that party is not only seen as efficient, clean and incorruptible but also, in truth, is efficient and incorruptible. I am a Malaysian and though many in Malaysia may welcome Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Rakyat as the ruling party one day the jury will be out for a very long time on whether that party is right for us because of the entrenched culture of corruption in Malaysia. So to those Singaporeans weary of PAP rule, I say, stop griping for change; things could be much worse!&quot;

Dear Outsider,

You have declared yourself  that you are a Malaysian. That means you have not lived the life of an ordinary Singapore in Singapore. Then how can you even speak for Singaporeans and try to advice true blue Singaporeans what to do? Remember, the grass is always greener on the other side?

From what you say, I think your perception about SPH being &quot;top-notch&quot; is either misguided or totally skewed. It also clearly shows the shallowness of your knowledge and how ignorant you can be.

And by the way, corruption can be anywhere in the world, not necessary in Malaysia alone. Wherever there is greed, there is corruption. It is either done openly or in private, legally or illegally, acceptable or unacceptable. And corruption does not only cover monetary gains. It covers a very wide spectrum of human desires, including also the &quot;Greed for Power and Control&quot; over the lives of everybody. That is the worst of all corruptions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Outsider.</p>
<p>&#8220;Singapore does not need a Singaporekini because there really is no need for one. Singapore Press Holdings’ journalists are top-notch and their reports on Malaysia are sought even by Malaysians who seek alternative media and &#8211; of course &#8211; the truth. Singapore may be ruled by one political party with an iron fist at times but what’s wrong with that as long as that party is not only seen as efficient, clean and incorruptible but also, in truth, is efficient and incorruptible. I am a Malaysian and though many in Malaysia may welcome Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Rakyat as the ruling party one day the jury will be out for a very long time on whether that party is right for us because of the entrenched culture of corruption in Malaysia. So to those Singaporeans weary of PAP rule, I say, stop griping for change; things could be much worse!&#8221;</p>
<p>Dear Outsider,</p>
<p>You have declared yourself  that you are a Malaysian. That means you have not lived the life of an ordinary Singapore in Singapore. Then how can you even speak for Singaporeans and try to advice true blue Singaporeans what to do? Remember, the grass is always greener on the other side?</p>
<p>From what you say, I think your perception about SPH being &#8220;top-notch&#8221; is either misguided or totally skewed. It also clearly shows the shallowness of your knowledge and how ignorant you can be.</p>
<p>And by the way, corruption can be anywhere in the world, not necessary in Malaysia alone. Wherever there is greed, there is corruption. It is either done openly or in private, legally or illegally, acceptable or unacceptable. And corruption does not only cover monetary gains. It covers a very wide spectrum of human desires, including also the &#8220;Greed for Power and Control&#8221; over the lives of everybody. That is the worst of all corruptions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iklan Mudah Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 06</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-2518</link>
		<dc:creator>Iklan Mudah Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Weekly Roundup: Week 06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-2518</guid>
		<description>[...] Animals And Ate Our Own! - TOC: STOMP the biggest loser in TPJC controversy - Wayang Party Club: Why there is no ‘Malaysiakini’ in Singapore - Nomadism: “New POSB branch concept”..is it really that new? - Cavalierio: Just ask (from See [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Animals And Ate Our Own! &#8211; TOC: STOMP the biggest loser in TPJC controversy &#8211; Wayang Party Club: Why there is no ‘Malaysiakini’ in Singapore &#8211; Nomadism: “New POSB branch concept”..is it really that new? &#8211; Cavalierio: Just ask (from See [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>Hi curious,

It is actually an improvement. It was 154th below Afghanistan not too long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi curious,</p>
<p>It is actually an improvement. It was 154th below Afghanistan not too long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-2276</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-2276</guid>
		<description>just found out we are one spot above Afghanistan! 
http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=24025</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just found out we are one spot above Afghanistan!<br />
<a href="http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=24025" rel="nofollow">http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=24025</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>what&#039;s the Straits Times global ranking again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what&#8217;s the Straits Times global ranking again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soojenn</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-2258</link>
		<dc:creator>soojenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-2258</guid>
		<description>There are better names than Singaporekini.... why do Singaporeans need to follow behind Malaysia. If they are to invent a new media, I believe they would be able to do better than the one set up by Malaysia. Have you forgotten, Singapore has most of the times done better in many ways than Malaysia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are better names than Singaporekini&#8230;. why do Singaporeans need to follow behind Malaysia. If they are to invent a new media, I believe they would be able to do better than the one set up by Malaysia. Have you forgotten, Singapore has most of the times done better in many ways than Malaysia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zxc</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>zxc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Singapore Press Holdings’ journalists are top-notch

Fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Singapore Press Holdings’ journalists are top-notch</p>
<p>Fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outsider</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Outsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>Singapore does not need a Singaporekini because there really is no need for one. Singapore Press Holdings’ journalists are top-notch and their reports on Malaysia are sought even by Malaysians who seek alternative media and - of course - the truth. Singapore may be ruled by one political party with an iron fist at times but what’s wrong with that as long as that party is not only seen as efficient, clean and incorruptible but also, in truth, is efficient and incorruptible. I am a Malaysian and though many in Malaysia may welcome Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Rakyat as the ruling party one day the jury will be out for a very long time on whether that party is right for us because of the entrenched culture of corruption in Malaysia. So to those Singaporeans weary of PAP rule, I say, stop griping for change; things could be much worse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singapore does not need a Singaporekini because there really is no need for one. Singapore Press Holdings’ journalists are top-notch and their reports on Malaysia are sought even by Malaysians who seek alternative media and &#8211; of course &#8211; the truth. Singapore may be ruled by one political party with an iron fist at times but what’s wrong with that as long as that party is not only seen as efficient, clean and incorruptible but also, in truth, is efficient and incorruptible. I am a Malaysian and though many in Malaysia may welcome Anwar Ibrahim’s Pakatan Rakyat as the ruling party one day the jury will be out for a very long time on whether that party is right for us because of the entrenched culture of corruption in Malaysia. So to those Singaporeans weary of PAP rule, I say, stop griping for change; things could be much worse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/02/01/why-there-is-no-malaysiakini-in-singapore/comment-page-1/#comment-2207</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.79.203.2/~wayangpa/?p=4721#comment-2207</guid>
		<description>there can be no &quot;singaporekini&quot; because 30 years of &quot;Speak Mandarin&quot; campaigning have left Singaporeans unable and uninterested to speak what should be their frakkin&#039; NATIONAL LANGUAGE (sic)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there can be no &#8220;singaporekini&#8221; because 30 years of &#8220;Speak Mandarin&#8221; campaigning have left Singaporeans unable and uninterested to speak what should be their frakkin&#8217; NATIONAL LANGUAGE (sic)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
