Tan Kin Lian’s continued liaison with SDP may prove more to be a hindrance than help
By Fang Zhi Yuan, Chief Editor
According to SDP’s website, Mr Tan Kin Lian will be gracing its event at Hong Lim Park on 31st December 2008 with a speech.
SDP will be holding a New Year Eve Countdown at Hong Lim Park where it will be lining up a panel of speakers to honor the memory of the late J.B. Jeyaretnam.
While fellow opposition leaders Mr Low Thia Kiang and Mr Chiam See Tong have been avoiding SDP as a plague, it is indeed gentlemanly and courageous of Mr Tan to accept SDP’s invitation to speak at their event.
Undoubtably, SDP is the only true blue opposition party left in Singapore which dares to confront the ruling elites heads on.
On principles and paper alone, Dr Chee Soon Juan should have become the de facto opposition leader in Singapore.
Though I do not consider myself a SDP supporter, I will gladly cast my vote for them should they contest in my constituency in the next General Election, but with an impending bankruptcy suit looming over their heads, will SDP still be in existence by then ?
While I respect SDP for their conviction and determination, they remained unelectable at the ballot box. In fact, Dr Chee has already given up on the electoral process as a viable route to effect much needed changes in the system.
In spite of the controversies enshrouding the non-violent activism it espouses, SDP did force the government to yield some ground in the recent token permitting of outdoor protests at Hong Lim Park.
Unfortunately in the long-term, SDP is unlikely to win any more new fans. The crowd attending its countdown at Hong Lim Park will indicate how far it will go in the next few years.
By associating himself with SDP, Mr Tan is sending out the message that he does agree with some of the political methods being employed by the SDP.
Will this be an asset or hindrance to Mr Tan’s own political ambitions in the future should he decide to run for public office ?
What Mr Tan needs now is both a political vehicle and a grassroots machinery to lay down the ground work for him.
Being in the PAP for 30 years, he should be more aware than anybody else of the importance of having grassroots support to organize an election campaign.
There is already a “Volunteers for TKL” group which is charged with collecting signatures for his petition to run for public office from which he can build and expand upon.
As for the political platform, Mr Tan could well afford to set up a new party on his own or join an existing one, perhaps the now rudderless Reform Party founded recently by J.B. Jeyaretnam before his untimely demise with little or no political baggage.
Mr Tan is one of the few high-profile establishment figures who have crossed over to the “opposition” in recent years (if opposition is the correct word to use). It is a coup for SDP to have him speak at their event. However, will Mr Tan’s urbane middle class supporters continue to stick with him if he continues to lean further towards SDP ?
If Mr Tan has indeed set his sights on running for political office, he must remove all possible obstacles in his path on the parliamentary route. Unless he intends to stay an activist all his life, it is neither pragmatic or wise to be labelled as part of the “SDP gang” by the state media.
Both the electoral process and extra-parliamentary activism play equally important roles in breaking the PAP’s political monopoly and they are not mutually exclusive of each other.
Without civic consciousness and activism, an uninformed and naive electorate will always be swayed by the carrots and stick approach adopted by the PAP. With no MPs in Parliament, there will be no independent voices to provide an effective check and balance on the government.
To put it bluntly, SDP needs credible moderates like Mr Tan more than Mr Tan needs them. Mr Tan’s kind gesture to SDP will surely win him the support of hardcore opposition voters, but he needs to ensure that he does not ailenate the middle ground at the same time in doing so.
7 Responses to “Tan Kin Lian’s continued liaison with SDP may prove more to be a hindrance than help”
Allan Ooi AWARE Chee Soon Juan Chiam See Tong Claire Lee David Widjaja DBS Dr Allan Ooi Dr Silviu Ionescu Dr Vivian Balakrishnan Foyce Le Xuan highnote5 Hong Lim Park Jack Lin Xinli Jack Neo Jack Neo affair Jack Neo scandal Josie Lau Josie Lau Meng Lee Kenneth Jeyaretnam Lee Kuan Yew Lehman brothers Lighthouse Evangelism MAS minibonds Miss Singapore World NTU stabbing PAP Pastor Rony Tan Ris Low Romanian diplomat in hit-and-run Rony Tan S-League silviu ionescu Singapore Singapore 2010 Youth Olympic Games Tan Kin Lian Thio Su Mien Tiger Woods affair Tong Kok Wai Top 8 Vivian Balakrishnan Wendy Chong Y O G Youth Olympic Games
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.








It is not the end of Spore if SDP breaks up. Because new parties can be formed.
It appears now there is almost an unspoken unexpected “alliance” between the opposition parties. Chee and SDP push the boundaries and confront the PAP hegemony head on. While WP, Chiam and the rest reaps the benefits. Actually not a bad arrangement, as long as more Sporeans stop voting for the pap.
It is certainly a very good arrangement for WP, Chiam and the rest as they take zero risks and reap all of the benefits while SDP members are incarcerated and bankrolled. Certainly the WP has even gone to the extent of disparaging CSJ and SDP to gain political acceptance from PAP. But is this the kind of opposition we want in parliament to begin with; an opposition that does not challenge the status quo? An opposition that puts its self interest at the expense of the people that voted for it in the first place?
What good comes out of voting for such opposition other than a sham democracy? Can someone please let me what such opposition politicians have achieved for the people whilst in parliament all these while?
Hi Gunny,
Don’t forget that Sylvia Lim rebutted Dr Chee last year at IBA Conference in front of an international audience that “PAP’s laws are fair and just and WP has no problems looking for a lawyer”.
Perhaps, she should offer her assistance to the minibond victims now that it is learnt that few lawyers want to take up their case due to conflict of interest.
SDP is the bona fide opposition party in Singapore and the rest especially
with elected representatives in Parliament are the peoples’ disappointment
Do Singaporeans really know what they want from an opposition party? One that asks hard hitting questions about the affairs of Singaporeans and the state of our country or tame questions that the PAP MPs usually ask to obtain the standard replies from the leaders. A party is only as strong as its leaders. Even if SDP is no more, it is the people that lead that count. Isn’t this the mindset of most Singaporeans? Let someone else take the risk and they will ride on the benefits!
A well-balanced article.
Hi Sylvester,
Singaporeans as a whole do want a robust opposition to ask hard questions in Parliament. At the same time, they also want credible and moderate opposition MPs in Parliament. This is not to say that Dr Chee is lacks credibility. The problem is that his image and reputation have been utterly demolished by the state media and it is impossible to rectify in the eyes of the public.
In politics, grassroots support is crucial in order for a party to have a voice in Parliament. The alternative media is a useful tool to reach out to citizens, but its reach and influence are severely curtailed.
Please watch the video below and hear what the last uncle has to say about Mr Low and Dr Chee:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5g6Gs9Lpj8
Eugene Yeo